2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.07.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An algorithm for moment-matching scenario generation with application to financial portfolio optimisation

Abstract: We present an algorithm for moment-matching scenario generation. This method produces scenarios and corresponding probability weights that match exactly the given mean, the covariance matrix, the average of the marginal skewness and the average of the marginal kurtosis of each individual component of a random vector. Optimisation is not employed in the scenario generation process and thus the method is computationally more advantageous than previous approaches. The algorithm is used for generating scenarios in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on a series of analysis, it was found that the distribution of CVaR is uniformed, thus, in this paper, a is the considered equal to 0.95 [34,35]. In the model, k is a nonnegative trade-off coefficient representing the exchange rate of mean cost for risk, which is specified by decision makers according to their risk preferences, and it can be chosen as any real numbers.…”
Section: Results Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on a series of analysis, it was found that the distribution of CVaR is uniformed, thus, in this paper, a is the considered equal to 0.95 [34,35]. In the model, k is a nonnegative trade-off coefficient representing the exchange rate of mean cost for risk, which is specified by decision makers according to their risk preferences, and it can be chosen as any real numbers.…”
Section: Results Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where k is the weighting factor presenting the tradeoff between the expected cost and CVaR; n ± denotes the value of VaR; a is confidence level, usually it could be set as 0.90, 0.95 and 0.99 [34,35]. subject to:…”
Section: Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, it exposes the difficulties involved in the optimization of portfolios and the limitations of mathematical models to account for all the information and sources of risk. Each of the risk measures applied in this study differs from the others by stressing a particular portfolio optimization component, as opposed to various methodologies already presented in the recent relevant literature, such as in Hassanzadeh et al (2014), Levy and Levy (2014), Utz et al (2014) or Ponomareva et al, (2015). For instance, in our work the CVaR and CDaR measures stress the modeling of returns values falling below a threshold value commonly expressed as a horizontal line (i.e.…”
Section: Canonical Drawable and Regular Vinesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…To eliminate the controversy, the author suggest setting two or three macroscenarios, which would subsequently engender their individuals scenarios, thus ensuring the logic consistency of the tree. The studies exemplify how scenario trees are made [16][17][18].…”
Section: The Development Of the General Methodology For The Scenario-mentioning
confidence: 99%