2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An algorithm for estimation of shoulder muscle forces for clinical use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
89
0
12

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
89
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…In the literature, the indeterminate problem has been solved by four different methods: by avoiding it altogether by using only one muscle (Inman et al, 1944), by using EMG measurements (Poppen and Walker, 1978), by using optimization methods (van der Helm, 1994;Karlsson and Peterson, 1992;Favre et al, 2005), and by using constant force ratios (Wuelker et al, 1995;Apreleva et al, 2000) or other predetermined muscle forces (Soslowsky et al, 1992b). As for the above cadaver models, the constant ratios method used in the present paper seems quite reasonable for abduction in the scapular plane, since all abductor muscles are nearly symmetrical in this plane and produce nearly proportional EMG signals (Ringelberg, 1985).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, the indeterminate problem has been solved by four different methods: by avoiding it altogether by using only one muscle (Inman et al, 1944), by using EMG measurements (Poppen and Walker, 1978), by using optimization methods (van der Helm, 1994;Karlsson and Peterson, 1992;Favre et al, 2005), and by using constant force ratios (Wuelker et al, 1995;Apreleva et al, 2000) or other predetermined muscle forces (Soslowsky et al, 1992b). As for the above cadaver models, the constant ratios method used in the present paper seems quite reasonable for abduction in the scapular plane, since all abductor muscles are nearly symmetrical in this plane and produce nearly proportional EMG signals (Ringelberg, 1985).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the Dickerson model is an implementation of the model developed by Hogfors and co-workers (Hogfors et al, 1987(Hogfors et al, ,1991(Hogfors et al, ,1995. For the other included models, moment arm data were extracted from published or dissertation data from the Favre model (Favre et al, 2005), Garner model (Garner and Pandy, 2001), and Newcastle model (Charlton, 2003); the availability of these models is not known.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnitude of the load applied to the joint was not representative of the forces acting in vivo. 3,9,21,33,39 Because the in vivo forces causing dislocation of the reverse prosthesis remain unknown 17 this force was selected to reproduce the standards implemented in previous studies, 18,26,31,38 and was chosen low enough to avoid deformation of the polyethylene cup. 1,11 Furthermore, it has been shown that there exist a linear relationship between the compressive and the dislocation force, 17 indicating that the stability ratio is independent of the compressive load in the reverse setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%