2017
DOI: 10.1101/162974
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Algorithm for Cellular Reprogramming

Abstract: The day we understand the time evolution of subcellular elements at a level of detail comparable to physical systems governed by Newton's laws of motion seems far away. Even so, quantitative approaches to cellular dynamics add to our understanding of cell biology, providing data-guided frameworks that allow us to develop better predictions about, and methods for, control over specific biological processes and system-wide cell behavior. In this paper, we describe an approach to optimizing the use of transcripti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Predictions are obtained following different techniques, with probabilistic modelling in [3,5,6], or qualitative modelling in [2,7,21,24]. Sequential reprogramming is also studied in the literature [1,19,12] using quite different approaches: Abou-Jaoudé et al [1] applied model checking to verify that a set of perturbations can reprogram the cell correctly, using other attractors as intermediate steps if needed, Ronquist et al [19] used a quantitative model that returns a specific time for the perturbations to be made; lastly in the work of Mandon et al [12], the perturbations can be done at any time, but require precise knowledge of the state of the system (i.e., complete observability).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Predictions are obtained following different techniques, with probabilistic modelling in [3,5,6], or qualitative modelling in [2,7,21,24]. Sequential reprogramming is also studied in the literature [1,19,12] using quite different approaches: Abou-Jaoudé et al [1] applied model checking to verify that a set of perturbations can reprogram the cell correctly, using other attractors as intermediate steps if needed, Ronquist et al [19] used a quantitative model that returns a specific time for the perturbations to be made; lastly in the work of Mandon et al [12], the perturbations can be done at any time, but require precise knowledge of the state of the system (i.e., complete observability).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, allowing perturbations to be performed at different points in time opens alternative reprogramming paths, possibly less costly. In general, sequential reprogramming allows the network to be perturbed in any state (transient states or states in an attractor) [19,12]. This requires complete observability of the system, which is very hard to obtain experimentally.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other works [1], [18], the model allows for sequential reprogramming, making them sequential existential reprogramming. In [1], the existence of solutions is checked through a model checker, and specific perturbation paths can be tested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [1], the existence of solutions is checked through a model checker, and specific perturbation paths can be tested. In [18], the model is probabilistic and use timeseries data, thus allowing to make perturbations at different times in the series.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation