2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.10.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An algorithm for actigraphy-based sleep/wake scoring: Comparison with polysomnography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both sleep variables estimated by actigraphy differed significantly from those measured by the smartphone sleep diary. The actigraphy-based estimates of NA and TST were all within the range of those reported in a recent study comparing different algorithms [ 37 ]. In insomniacs, estimated TSTs are typically shorter if measured by diary than by polysomnography [ 38 ], contrary to the findings in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Both sleep variables estimated by actigraphy differed significantly from those measured by the smartphone sleep diary. The actigraphy-based estimates of NA and TST were all within the range of those reported in a recent study comparing different algorithms [ 37 ]. In insomniacs, estimated TSTs are typically shorter if measured by diary than by polysomnography [ 38 ], contrary to the findings in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Furthermore, we did not compare the performance of the spectral slope and neural complexity to other potentially powerful biomarkers. Therefore, it would be interesting to see how accurate sleep stages can be scored exclusively by means of the slope or complexity and how these two markers perform in comparison to other indices of sleep depth like heart rate variability and blood pressure (Kuula & Pesonen, 2021; Mitsukura et al, 2020; Radha et al, 2019; van de Borne et al, 1994) or accelerometric data from actigraphy (Lüdtke et al, 2021; Sadeh et al, 1989) and multisensor consumer-wearables (Ameen et al, 2019; Boe et al, 2019; Roberts et al, 2020; Tal et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies consequently have focused on validating actigraphs and commercial smartwatches against PSG. Mantua et al [ 16 ], for example, found no difference between a research-based actigraph and PSG in total-sleep-time and sleep efficiency (see also Lüdtke et al [ 17 ]), but as expected, actigraphy performed poorer on a more finely grained analysis of sleep stages. Similar conclusions have been recently drawn by others who evaluated the performance of commercial smartwatches against PSG, pointing out that although the consumer-grade wearable devices are not yet appropriate for quantifying sleep at high resolution or identifying sleep stages over the night, they still allow adequate estimates of sleep/wake distributions [ 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%