2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2016.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An algebraic model to determine substrate kinetic parameters by global nonlinear fit of progress curves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the latter numerical approach can have drawbacks that are widely ignored and show several weak points 12 , although the most common computing method to progress–curve analysis these days is to use numerical integration solvers linked to nonlinear regression algorithms. Hence, we also estimated the kinetic parameters in terms of an algebraic approach that gives the direct solution of Equation (1) to the integrated Michaelis–Menten rate equation (Table 1, DynaFit Lambert W) 9 . Unfortunately, the requirement for the Lambert W ( x ) built-in function in software (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the latter numerical approach can have drawbacks that are widely ignored and show several weak points 12 , although the most common computing method to progress–curve analysis these days is to use numerical integration solvers linked to nonlinear regression algorithms. Hence, we also estimated the kinetic parameters in terms of an algebraic approach that gives the direct solution of Equation (1) to the integrated Michaelis–Menten rate equation (Table 1, DynaFit Lambert W) 9 . Unfortunately, the requirement for the Lambert W ( x ) built-in function in software (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Progress curve experimental data were analysed by nonlinear regression fitting programme Dynafit using either numerical integration of differential equations that describe simple Michaelis–Menten reaction model E + S ⇆ ES → E + P or newly described algebraic solution for the Michaelis–Menten equation, which includes the Lambert W ( x ) function 9 , 10 : …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An algebraic correction for the observed nonlinearity due to spontaneous enzyme degradation can result in good estimates of kinetic parameters (Figure F); however, this type of algebraic correction does not accurately correct nonlinearity due to substrate depletion. Thus, numeric fitting is an alternative to fit the progress curve that results from depletion of substrate, enzyme, as well as inhibitor. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, numeric fitting is an alternative to fit the progress curve that results from depletion of substrate, enzyme, as well as inhibitor. 41,43 Following the same strategy, we can derive the rate equation for a two-step reversible process (Figure 1C) which is given in eq 5 and Figure S2. From the plot, we can calculate the steady state inhibition constant K i app and use it as a measure of potency for a reversible covalent inhibitor.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%