The studies of octahedral tilting in the tungsten bronzes [Whittle et al. (2015). Acta Cryst. B71, [342][343][344][345][346][347][348] were continued in the context of a more general approach to cooperative rotations of interconnected rigid units [Campbell et al. (2018). Acta Cryst. A74, 408-424]. That more general approach has detailed possible structures not identified in our 2015 paper. A brief comment on the implications of finite tilts for octahedral distortion is included.In a recent paper on the tungsten bronzes (Whittle et al., 2015) we attempted to enumerate the possibilities for tilting of the WO 6 octahedra in the hexagonal and tetragonal tungsten bronzes. There is no reason to doubt the structures we presented there. It soon became apparent, however, that at least in the case of tetragonal tungsten bronze (TTB) we had missed a number of acceptable tilt structures. Recall that TTB has a starting structure in space group P4/mbm, and that from searches at all the special points of the Brillouin zone we reported finding only one acceptable tilt system, at the A-point (k = 1 2 ; 1 2 ; 1 2 ). Through a subsequent analysis of TTB using the computer program CRUSH (Giddy et al., 1993), and from a paper (Smirnov & Saint-Gré goire, 2014) of which regrettably we were unaware until our work was in print, we realized that we should have found tilt systems at the Z-and R-points (k = 0; 0; 1 2 and k = 0; 1 2 ; 1 2 ) as well. Many of the arguments presented in our previous paper were sound. For example we argued that tilting around the unique (z) axis was not possible for three octahedra cornerlinked around a triangular channel. It followed that the only possible tilting would be around axes in the horizontal (x-y) planes. Any tilting around axes in a horizontal layer implied tilting in the reverse sense around layers above and below. This meant there must be a doubling of the c parameter and so we needed to consider only those (special) points of the Brillouin zone with k z = 1 2 . For HTB, with parent symmetry P6/ mmm, these are the A-, H-and L-points (k = 0; 0; 1 2 , k = 1 3 ; 1 3 ; 1 2 and k = 1 2 ; 0; 1 2 ) while for TTB they are the Z-, A-and R-points already mentioned. The ISOTROPY computer program (Stokes et al., 2014) was used to list the irreducible representations (irreps 1 ) at each of those points leading to tilting of the octahedra centred on the W atoms, these atoms being on Wyckoff 3f in HTB or on 2d and 8i in TTB. Irreps implying tilting of the octahedra around the z axis were immediately eliminated, which in the case of TTB for example left for consideration only Z þ 5 , A À 5 and R 1 . But the examination of