2013
DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An alcohol-focused intervention versus a healthy living intervention for problem drinkers identified in a general hospital setting (ADAPTA): study protocol for a randomized, controlled pilot trial

Abstract: BackgroundAlcohol misuse is a major cause of premature mortality and ill health. Although there is a high prevalence of alcohol problems among patients presenting to general hospital, many of these people are not help seekers and do not engage in specialist treatment. Hospital admission is an opportunity to steer people towards specialist treatment, which can reduce health-care utilization and costs to the public sector and produce substantial individual health and social benefits. Alcohol misuse is associated… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Addressing Drinking Among Patients: comparing Two Approaches (ADAPTA) was a pragmatic, randomised, controlled, open pilot trial comparing a healthy living intervention with an alcohol-focused intervention for problem drinkers identified in a general hospital setting. The design has been reported in full elsewhere ( Watson et al, 2013 ). The study was granted ethical approval by the National Research Ethics Service Committee Yorkshire and The Humber—Leeds Central (Reference: 11/YH/0448).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Addressing Drinking Among Patients: comparing Two Approaches (ADAPTA) was a pragmatic, randomised, controlled, open pilot trial comparing a healthy living intervention with an alcohol-focused intervention for problem drinkers identified in a general hospital setting. The design has been reported in full elsewhere ( Watson et al, 2013 ). The study was granted ethical approval by the National Research Ethics Service Committee Yorkshire and The Humber—Leeds Central (Reference: 11/YH/0448).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Hospital In-Reach Team (HIRT) from a specialist addiction service visited the wards daily to try to engage patients in treatment, using a motivational interviewing style of consultation, in the same way as usual regardless of the research conditions. Patients with an alcohol-related diagnosis or a reason for admission that suggested a possible alcohol-related diagnosis (for example: pancreatitis, hypertension) were screened to determine eligibility as described previously ( Watson et al, 2013 ), including a score of 16 or higher on the AUDIT ( Babor et al, 2001 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Future research would benefit from comparing the online health check with an alcohol-only intervention to see which approach attracts a greater proportion of people drinking at hazardous and harmful levels. A randomised trial comparing in-person alcohol-only vs. multiple health behaviour intervention is currently underway in a UK general hospital setting [ 47 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%