2013
DOI: 10.1163/15700631-12340381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Akkadian Demon in the Talmud: Between Šulak and Bar-Širiqa

Abstract: This article examines the resemblance between the Talmudic privy demon (“Shed Bet ha-Kise”) and Šulak, a well-known Akkadian demon. There are four considerations that point to identifying the privy demon of the Talmud with the Babylonian demon Šulak: (1) They both dwell in the privy; (2) they both are demons that cause epilepsy, strokes, or sudden falls; (3) they both seem to have the form of a lion; and (4) their names (“Šulak” and “Bar Širiqa”) are very similar. This suggestion is yet another example of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These trends have led to an increase in more rhetorically-nuanced studies about the role of magic and intermediary beings in different periods of Jewish history. Scholars of ancient Judaism have examined manifestations of ritual power and intermediary beings in the Dead Sea Scrolls (Alexander 1999; Eshel 1999; Lichtenberger 2004), Hekhalot literature (Swartz 1996), the Late Antique Roman Empire as a whole (Bohak 2004, 2009, 2010), and the eastern Jewish communities of Sasanian Babylonia (Elman 2005b; Harari 2006; Rosen-Zvi 2011; A.M. Bamberger 2013; Ahuvia 2014; Ronis 2015).…”
Section: The Modern Study Of Intermediary Beingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These trends have led to an increase in more rhetorically-nuanced studies about the role of magic and intermediary beings in different periods of Jewish history. Scholars of ancient Judaism have examined manifestations of ritual power and intermediary beings in the Dead Sea Scrolls (Alexander 1999; Eshel 1999; Lichtenberger 2004), Hekhalot literature (Swartz 1996), the Late Antique Roman Empire as a whole (Bohak 2004, 2009, 2010), and the eastern Jewish communities of Sasanian Babylonia (Elman 2005b; Harari 2006; Rosen-Zvi 2011; A.M. Bamberger 2013; Ahuvia 2014; Ronis 2015).…”
Section: The Modern Study Of Intermediary Beingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geller has noted the survival of Akkadian demon-names, symptoms of demonic attacks and their corresponding treatments, and even the form of diagnostic handbooks into Babylonian Talmudic literature (2000: 13-32). Stol and A. Bamberger have also identified specific demons and diseases in the Babylonian Talmud that are drawn directly from ancient Mesopotamian demonology (A. Bamberger 2013; Stol 1993, 2000: 167).…”
Section: Intermediary Beings In Rabbinic Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to comparison with relatively contemporaneous literatures, scholars have reached back to sources from thousands of years prior to the Babylonian Talmud. For example, Markham Geller (, , and ) has brought a number of Akkadian medical sources into dialogue with the Babylonia Talmud, Avigail Manekin Bamberger () has identified an Akkadian demon mentioned in the Talmud, and a recent (aforementioned) volume, The Aggada of the Babylonian Talmud and its Cultural World , dedicates its first section to “The Mesopotamian Context” of the Bavli (see especially Ronis, ). Reaching past the likely redaction date of the Talmud, we also find scholars bringing the Bavli into conversation with early Islamic sources (e.g., Azaiez, ; Elman, ; Mazuz, ).…”
Section: Other Literatures and Recent Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%