An AHP-GA-BP Algorithm for Evaluation of Enterprise Collaborative Innovation Management of Intellectual Property Rights

Abstract

Based on the theory of BP neural network, we use AHP method to construct the index system and standard of enterprise collaborative management of intellectual property rights under the view of innovation, and the specific evaluation indexes are given from five aspects. In this paper, in order to overcome the existing shortcomings of multi index system In the evaluation method, we use AHP-GA-BP neural network to comprehensive evaluation each index of enterprise intellectual property management. Our method not only displays the evaluation expert experience in learning The evaluation results show that this algorithm can effectively analyze enterprise intellectual property management problems.

Mechanisms to manage intellectual property in collaborative innovation projects

“…The co-creation techniques seek collaborative development of new products, hand-in-hand with the end customer, accelerating the process of market introduction of new products or services, given that the end users involved in the process have validated key features of these innovations. Additionally, use value is added to the co-creative process, as it is produced according to needs identified by the customers themselves (Ramaswamy, 2009;Paasi et alii, 2010a;Rodríguez et alii, 2011;Ruiz-Moreno et alii, 2014;Xiaoyi and Chaoming, 2014). For its implementation, it is necessary that the participant agents share tacit knowledge relevant to the process, that they interact with it and have the ability of generate new knowledge (Leiponen, 2008;Paasi et alii, 2010b).…”

“…Therefore, under the model of innovation, designing IP policies creates the context for the definition and use of the mechanisms. According to Blomqvist et alii (2005); Kaiser (2010); Salazar and Silva (2010); Payumo et alii (2012); Allarakhia (2013); ; Mejia (2014); Xiaoyi and Chaoming (2014) and Bstieler et alii (2015), the policies should include both the organization' s innovative model, and the resources and capabilities which it has, so that it allows management to, among other things:…”

“…• The IPM in the feedback: In this phase, it is expected that experts, customers, the research and development team or any agent of the alliance provide feedback of the results so decisions can be made about the course of the project and the developments obtained, as well as the technologies that have been incorporated in it. (Xiaoyi and Chaoming, 2014). At this stage, it is possible to make decisions that involve:…”

“…The IPM, at this stage, focuses on marketing processes, monitoring and transferring of the licensed IP or exploited IP. Marketing and transfer: It must be determined the type of license to be transferred, methods to be used, support, updates, possible future developments that licensed and licensor can make in regards to technology (Blomqvist et alii, 2005;Xiaoyi and Chaoming, 2014).…”

Risk Balancing in the Programmes – An Application in the Telecom Domain

“…AHP is a well-known MCDM (Multi Criteria Decision Making) method suitable for both objective and subjective judgements. Due to its easiness and flexibility [41], usage of AHP has been extensively observed in government, finance, education, defence, engineering, and frequent other disciplines (see for example [42,43,44,45]). Three key steps assumed by AHP are the hierarchy construction and representation, priority analysis and synthesis, and use of logical consistency test [46,47].…”