1986
DOI: 10.1109/tc.1986.1676840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Aggregation Technique for the Transient Analysis of Stiff Markov Chains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We use the M/M/1 queuing system with server breakdown and repair, explained in [7], as another example to illustrate analytic-numeric epistemic uncertainty propagation. In [7], an approximate expression for the average number of jobs in the system, is derived for an M/M/1 system with breakdown and repair of the server, using an aggregation technique developed to handle the stiffness in the model due to orders of magnitude of difference in parameter values (rate of job arrival and service being much faster than the rate of server breakdown and repair).…”
Section: M/m/1 Queue With Server Breakdown and Repairmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We use the M/M/1 queuing system with server breakdown and repair, explained in [7], as another example to illustrate analytic-numeric epistemic uncertainty propagation. In [7], an approximate expression for the average number of jobs in the system, is derived for an M/M/1 system with breakdown and repair of the server, using an aggregation technique developed to handle the stiffness in the model due to orders of magnitude of difference in parameter values (rate of job arrival and service being much faster than the rate of server breakdown and repair).…”
Section: M/m/1 Queue With Server Breakdown and Repairmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [7], an approximate expression for the average number of jobs in the system, is derived for an M/M/1 system with breakdown and repair of the server, using an aggregation technique developed to handle the stiffness in the model due to orders of magnitude of difference in parameter values (rate of job arrival and service being much faster than the rate of server breakdown and repair). The Markov chain used to model the system in [7] has been reproduced in Figure 4.2, for ease of reference (while the figure in [7] is for an M/M/1/m system with server breakdown and repair, here, we have modified the figure by setting m to ∞, for it to model an M/M/1 system with server breakdown and repair). The states of the Markov chain are denoted by (l, k), where l is the number of customers/jobs in the system and k is the number of non-failed servers.…”
Section: M/m/1 Queue With Server Breakdown and Repairmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integrating system availability and performance in a single model often causes the largeness and stiffness problem [11,12]. We built hierarchical model for system modeling.…”
Section: Hierarchical System Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and ET RRt is approximated with error " by the ET RR a N t given by (2). The computational cost of standard randomization is essentially the cost of performing the N vector-matrix multiplications qk I qkP, k H; I; F F F ; N À I. Qt has, for Ãt 3 I, an asymptotic normal distribution with mean and variance Ãt [20], and, for large Ãt and " ( I, the required N is % Ãt, making standard randomization computationally very expensive if both X and Ãt are large.…”
Section: Review Of Standard and Regenerative Randomizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An approach to deal with stiffness is the aggregation technique proposed in [2]. For class g HH models, that technique could be used to aggregate the states in S À fog, yielding an aggregated CTMC model with a transient state and A absorbing states with symbolic solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%