2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnca.2012.07.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An aggregate marker for bandwidth fairness in DiffServ

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This mechanism is performed at the core router by means of a queuing algorithm, such as weighted round robin (WRR), weighted fair queuing (WFQ), weighted random early detection (WRED) and random early detection (RED), with an input and output queue (RIO) [26,27]. Together with the unfairness problem of sharing bandwidth among flow aggregates, there are several causes for the locking of QoS in the DiffServ network [28][29][30]. Therefore, more marker algorithms have been designed to find the optimal solution for fair sharing of the TCP flow aggregates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This mechanism is performed at the core router by means of a queuing algorithm, such as weighted round robin (WRR), weighted fair queuing (WFQ), weighted random early detection (WRED) and random early detection (RED), with an input and output queue (RIO) [26,27]. Together with the unfairness problem of sharing bandwidth among flow aggregates, there are several causes for the locking of QoS in the DiffServ network [28][29][30]. Therefore, more marker algorithms have been designed to find the optimal solution for fair sharing of the TCP flow aggregates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the marker algorithms were not designed to investigate the unfairness problem or responsive and nonresponsive fairness in the aggregate and their causes [28]. This article proposes a new efficient marker algorithm to find the optimal solution for the unfairness of sharing bandwidth, responsive and non-responsive fairness, and studies the performance measurement for the causes of the number of TCP flows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%