1978
DOI: 10.1093/jac/4.1.94
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An agar well punching-sucking device for diffusion assays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cell-free supernatant (CFS) was separated from the fermentation broth at 8000 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C. Determination of antimicrobial activity was tested by agar well diffusion assay [ 19 ]. The indicator strain M. luteus 10209 came from China Center for Industrial Culture Collection (CICC, Beijing, China) with the collection number of CICC 10209 and was incubated at 30 °C for 12 h.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cell-free supernatant (CFS) was separated from the fermentation broth at 8000 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C. Determination of antimicrobial activity was tested by agar well diffusion assay [ 19 ]. The indicator strain M. luteus 10209 came from China Center for Industrial Culture Collection (CICC, Beijing, China) with the collection number of CICC 10209 and was incubated at 30 °C for 12 h.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sizes of the wells varied from 5.00 mm to 5.50 mm depending on the experiment. Hallynck and Pijck (1978) noted that cutting wells in agar with a cork borer can lead to wells with unevenly cut edges. To remove this potential source of inaccuracy, the measurement referred to as cleared zone (CZ) was de veloped.…”
Section: Plate Countsmentioning
confidence: 99%