2011
DOI: 10.3763/ijas.2010.0556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An African success: the case of conservation agriculture in Zimbabwe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
60
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
60
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Farmers attributed it to higher water retention capacity in conservation agriculture than in conventional agriculture. Other studies have shown higher infiltration rates and water holding capacity in conservation agriculture plots than in conventional agriculture plots (Marongwe et al, 2011;Zarea, 2011). Farmers also argued that early land preparation and planting associated with conservation agriculture increased chances of survival of the maize crop from floods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Farmers attributed it to higher water retention capacity in conservation agriculture than in conventional agriculture. Other studies have shown higher infiltration rates and water holding capacity in conservation agriculture plots than in conventional agriculture plots (Marongwe et al, 2011;Zarea, 2011). Farmers also argued that early land preparation and planting associated with conservation agriculture increased chances of survival of the maize crop from floods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wherever CA has been adopted it appears to have had both agricultural and environmental benefits, as shown in Table 4. CA has now spread to some 25,000ha in Lesotho, Kenya, Tanzania and Zimbabwe, and resulted in increased and more stable yields (Marongwe et al, 2011;Owenya et al, 2011). In Zimbabwe, 8,000 farmers have adopted CA methods, resulting in maize yields growing by 67 per cent.…”
Section: Livestockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conservation agriculture has the potential to reduce water stress in crops, which is critically important in southern Africa as the region braces for the hotter and drier weather predicted by climate change models (Lobell et al, 2008). The benefits of CA have been validated empirically through various studies around the world such as those of Cavalieri et al (2009), Affholder et al (2010), Marongwe et al (2011) and Mazvimavi (2011). As a result, many institutions have invested in efforts to transfer this technology to smallholder farmers, particularly those of sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Promotion of CA has been suggested as a key strategy to alleviating the negative impact of drought and rainfall variability. Despite promotional efforts by donor agencies in Zimbabwe, adoption rates of CA by smallholder farmers have been disappointing (Marongwe et al, 2011;Andersson & Giller, 2012). In practice, smallholder farmers have modified the CA package and adopted some components of the technology such as digging planting basins while leaving out others, such as mulching and crop rotation (Giller et al, 2009;Mazvimavi & Twomlow 2009;Pedzisa et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%