2016
DOI: 10.1088/0741-3335/58/12/125017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An advection–diffusion model for cross-field runaway electron transport in perturbed magnetic fields

Abstract: Disruption-generated runaway electrons (RE) present an outstanding issue for ITER. The predictive computational studies of RE generation rely on orbitaveraged computations and, as such, they lack the effects from the magnetic field stochasticity. Since stochasiticity is naturally present in post-disruption plasma, and externally induced stochastization offers a prominent mechanism to mitigate RE avalanche, we present an advection-diffusion model that can be used to couple an orbit-following code to an orbit-av… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is still unfeasible for the existing codes and computers to simulate the randomized field directly, because of severe resolution requirements and the need for a kinetic rather than MHD description of the emerging short scales. This situation motivates numerous sensitivity studies of the fast electron transport to magnetic fluctuations produced by the MHD codes, created by external magnetic coils or to the arbitrarily postulated ones [21,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: B Resonant Mhd Perturbationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is still unfeasible for the existing codes and computers to simulate the randomized field directly, because of severe resolution requirements and the need for a kinetic rather than MHD description of the emerging short scales. This situation motivates numerous sensitivity studies of the fast electron transport to magnetic fluctuations produced by the MHD codes, created by external magnetic coils or to the arbitrarily postulated ones [21,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: B Resonant Mhd Perturbationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, the combined results reported in Figure 10-11 point to two mechanisms both occurring at the same favorable coil phasing which could affect the primary generated runaway electrons, thus reducing the initial seed, or those produced in the avalanche process. Nevertheless, a deeper understanding of these issues would require a detailed analysis directly by modeling the RE trajectories in these 3D fields [56] and/or an investigation with a two-fluid approach [57], considering also non-linear effects in the plasma response to RMPs. When two-fluid terms are included in the response calculations, the ion and electron rotation velocities are no longer the same; in particular the electron velocity results to be the relevant quantity controlling the field penetration in the core of the plasma at the mode-rational surface.…”
Section: Role Of Plasma Response In Re Mitigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetic fluctuations of interest tend to be nearly static on the electron transit time-scale, and the resulting heat diffusion coefficient should then be proportional to the electron thermal speed and scale as δ B ( ) 2 with the perturbation level. There has been an extensive work aimed at modeling and deeper understanding of the field stochastization and its consequences [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. One of the noteworthy outcomes is that the contribution of the very short wavelengths perturbations to transport is relatively small as a result of averaging along the guiding center orbit or full gyro-orbit.…”
Section: Critical Role Of Bulk Electron Coolingmentioning
confidence: 99%