2022
DOI: 10.3233/jifs-220089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An advanced electrical vehicle charging station using adaptive hybrid particle swarm optimization intended for renewable energy system for simultaneous distributions

Abstract: A proposed hybrid approaches are incorporated in Electric Vehicle (EV) fast charging station (FCS) using (RES). Hybrid approach is improved by Adaptive Hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization (AHPSO) named as AHWPSO, moreover the proposed work Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO) is assist with adaptive hybridize PSO algorithm. Therefore, an overall pricing cost should be reduced maximum Electric Vehicle Charging Station (EVCS) with minimal installation. This simulation work is verified an adaptive time varying weightage p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The validation process involved analyzing the performance of PID controllers and a base case scenario where no control input was applied to each EV station placement bus. This comparison allowed for an assessment of the effectiveness by utilizing a PID controller with a Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) model for EV stations [19] and comparing it with a PID controller using RL and with no control input. By evaluating these different control approaches, the study aimed to determine their respective performances and identify the most suitable control strategy for regulating and stabilizing the power system in varying conditions.…”
Section: Pid-rl Control Performance Validation and Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The validation process involved analyzing the performance of PID controllers and a base case scenario where no control input was applied to each EV station placement bus. This comparison allowed for an assessment of the effectiveness by utilizing a PID controller with a Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) model for EV stations [19] and comparing it with a PID controller using RL and with no control input. By evaluating these different control approaches, the study aimed to determine their respective performances and identify the most suitable control strategy for regulating and stabilizing the power system in varying conditions.…”
Section: Pid-rl Control Performance Validation and Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study conducted a comparative analysis of the stability of the electric vehicle (EV) system with 1% capacity (30 MW) under three control scenarios: no control input, PID-PSO [19], and PID-RL (reinforcement learning). The highest PV penetration level was selected (50%) and a disturbance of 50 MW generation reduction occurred in the first second.…”
Section: Pid-rl Control Performance Validation and Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, dynamically adapting the routing decisions based on real-time energy availability and charging station locations can further optimize energy consumption. Another avenue for research is to explore the integration of renewable energy sources and charging infrastructure planning into the routing optimization process [95]. This can involve incorporating data on renewable energy generation, such as solar or wind power availability, and identifying optimal routes that enable EnFVs to recharge at strategically located charging stations powered by renewable sources.…”
Section: Enhancing Energy Efficiency and Sustainability In Routingmentioning
confidence: 99%