2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-20775-4_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Adequate, Denotational, Functional-Style Semantics for Typed FlatCurry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These restrictions are reasonable since polymorphism does not add extra insights and nonrecursive let-expressions with more than one binding can easily be split up into a series of bindings. Furthermore, Christiansen et al [11] point out that recursive let-expressions cannot be handled by a compositional semantics like the one we head for. We could also omit let-expressions completely because they can be simulated by function calls, but they are useful for example calculations.…”
Section: (Flat)currymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These restrictions are reasonable since polymorphism does not add extra insights and nonrecursive let-expressions with more than one binding can easily be split up into a series of bindings. Furthermore, Christiansen et al [11] point out that recursive let-expressions cannot be handled by a compositional semantics like the one we head for. We could also omit let-expressions completely because they can be simulated by function calls, but they are useful for example calculations.…”
Section: (Flat)currymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Christiansen et al [11] present a set-based denotational semantics for FlatCurry. We present a slightly modified version of this semantics and extend it with constructs for encapsulation.…”
Section: Semanticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations