2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2013.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An adaptive zero-variance importance sampling approximation for static network dependability evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several Monte Carlo variance-reduction methods have been proposed for network reliability estimation in rare-event situations; see, e.g., [3,5,10,15,19,28,25,31] and the references given there. Most of these methods are for the special case of independent links with binary states and nodes that never fail.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several Monte Carlo variance-reduction methods have been proposed for network reliability estimation in rare-event situations; see, e.g., [3,5,10,15,19,28,25,31] and the references given there. Most of these methods are for the special case of independent links with binary states and nodes that never fail.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this example we use the well-known dodecahedron network (Figure 3), with 20 nodes and 30 links, often used as a standard benchmark in network reliability estimation [3,9,11,12,31]. Here we took ρ = 0.7, b i = 4 and d net = 5.…”
Section: A Dodecahedron Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third type of application occurs in the setting where we want to estimate the probability of the rare event and to understand under which circumstances the rare event is likely to occur. A popular method to estimate is importance sampling, and the optimal way to do it is to sample under a density f proportional to the original density conditional on the rare event, and then adjust the estimator using a likelihood ratio (Tuffin et al 2014, Botev and Ridder 2014). This also fits our framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%