2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An adaptive time step solution for raster-based storage cell modelling of floodplain inundation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
195
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(199 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
195
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The minimum of both is taken as the final ‫.ݐ∆‬ Eq. (13) 115 is similar to the expressions found in other diffusive models (Hunter et al, 2005;and Cea et al, 116 2010), however herein the smallest allowable time step is twice of those models; the gain comes 117 from the fluxes discretization at the faces (Eq. (8)).…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The minimum of both is taken as the final ‫.ݐ∆‬ Eq. (13) 115 is similar to the expressions found in other diffusive models (Hunter et al, 2005;and Cea et al, 116 2010), however herein the smallest allowable time step is twice of those models; the gain comes 117 from the fluxes discretization at the faces (Eq. (8)).…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
“…Therefore, we leave the smpd implementation for 170 a future stage when simulations with large scale data on distributed machines are required. 171 Although there is no analytical solution, the shape and front propagation is intuitively correct as it 225 shows a marked step front which is delayed with the increase of the Manning's coefficient and its 226 behaviour is similar to the solution found in Hunter et al (2005). This test case is nonetheless more 227 demanding than the previous one because a nearly flat surface appears at x=0 m and becomes more 228 pronounced before and after the receding phase (i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The optimum time step is determined according to the Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy condition to prevent the water travelling more than one cell distance in a single step, and the transferrable volume of a cell to avoid the 'chequer board' oscillations. A similar methodology was used in the 2D cell storage models (Hunter et al, 2005;Yu and Lane, 2006a) to limit the flow exchanged between cells within a time step, or adjusting the time steps to capture the detailed flow dynamics.…”
Section: Methodology Urban Inundation Model (Uim)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameterisation of roughness is a fundamental aspect of hydraulic modelling. This is because the roughness of the channel and floodplain differ and therefore affect the conveyance of water in different ways (Hunter et al, 2005). The most common parameter used to represent roughness is Manning's n, which combines the effect of numerous factors which cause flow resistance, including vegetation , channel planform, obstructions, stage-discharge relationship and sediment interactions.…”
Section: Numerical Modelling Methodology For Downscalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Hunter et al (2005) solved this problem through developing an adaptive time step model which produced results that were independent of the grid size and time step. Bates et al (1996; also notes that there is a lack of appropriate data for validation and calibration of hydraulic models.…”
Section: Numerical Modelling Methodology For Downscalingmentioning
confidence: 99%