Proceedings of the 37th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research &Amp; Development in Information Retrieval 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2600428.2609556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An adaptive teleportation random walk model for learning social tag relevance

Abstract: Social tags are known to be a valuable source of information for image retrieval and organization. However, contrary to the conventional document retrieval, rich tag frequency information in social sharing systems, such as Flickr, is not available, thus we cannot directly use the tag frequency (analogous to the term frequency in a document) to represent the relevance of tags. Many heuristic approaches have been proposed to address this problem, among which the well-known neighbor voting based approaches are th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, they adopted the Rankboost [101] to learn an optimal combination of these multi-modality correlations, and generated a ranking function for tag recommendation. Recently, Zhu et al [102] proposed a method of tag recommendation based on the neighbor voting graph of tags. They casted the social tag relevance learning problem as an adaptive teleportation random walk process on the voting graph.…”
Section: Topics and Tags Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, they adopted the Rankboost [101] to learn an optimal combination of these multi-modality correlations, and generated a ranking function for tag recommendation. Recently, Zhu et al [102] proposed a method of tag recommendation based on the neighbor voting graph of tags. They casted the social tag relevance learning problem as an adaptive teleportation random walk process on the voting graph.…”
Section: Topics and Tags Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods are nonparametric, and the complexity of the learned hypotheses grows as the amount of training data increases. The neighbor voting algorithm [Li et al 2009b] and its variants [Kennedy et al 2009;Truong et al 2012;Lee et al 2013;Zhu et al 2014] estimate the relevance of a tag t with respect to an image x by counting the occurrence of t in annotations of the visual neighbors of x. The visual neighborhood is created using features obtained from early fusion of global features [Li et al 2009b], distance metric learning to combine local and global features [Verbeek et al 2010;Wu et al 2011], cross-modal learning of tags and image features [Qi et al 2012;Ballan et al 2014;Pereira et al 2014], and fusion of multiple single-feature learners Li 2016].…”
Section: Learning For Tag Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in Truong et al [2012] and Lee et al [2013], the visual similarity is used as the weights. As an alternative to such a heuristic strategy, Zhu et al [2014] model the relationships among the neighbors by constructing a directed voting graph, wherein there is a directed edge from image x i to image x j if x i is in the k nearest neighbors of x j . Subsequently, an adaptive random walk is conducted over the voting graph to estimate the tag relevance.…”
Section: Learning For Tag Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tag  Zhu et al [13], proposed graph voting. Graph voting is an oriented graph in which the nodes are annotated images by t tag in X. there…”
Section: B Tag Retrievingmentioning
confidence: 99%