2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2020.112858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An adaptive stabilized method for advection–diffusion–reaction equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 2019 ; Araya et al. 2020 ). The two-dimensional advection–diffusion reaction equation with Dirichlet-type boundary conditions can be written as follows: On the other hand, the TFADRE is a variant of the classical advection–diffusion reaction equation in which the integer-order derivative is replaced by the Caputo fractional derivative.…”
Section: The Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2019 ; Araya et al. 2020 ). The two-dimensional advection–diffusion reaction equation with Dirichlet-type boundary conditions can be written as follows: On the other hand, the TFADRE is a variant of the classical advection–diffusion reaction equation in which the integer-order derivative is replaced by the Caputo fractional derivative.…”
Section: The Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The class of adaptive numerical methods is a practical technique often in conjunction with classical numerical schemes, such as finite elements and finite volumes, to reduce the overall computational cost while obtaining a highly accurate numerical solution. Generally speaking, three classes of adaptive approaches are available in the literature, including local mesh refinement (h$$ h $$‐adaptive), 1‐5 moving mesh approach (r$$ r $$‐adaptive), 6,7 and a numerical method by locally increasing the degree polynomial of basis functions on selected elements (p$$ p $$‐adaptive) 8 . For example, an h$$ h $$‐adaptive finite element (FEM) method consists of a loop of three key phases: solution, error estimation, and local mesh refinement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This second approach is the most popular strategy of evaluating error behavior and it is adopted in the present work. In contrast to the gradient-based h-adaptive finite element methods as those investigated in [23,24,25], linear systems in the proposed enriched Galerkin-characteristics finite element method keep the same structure and size at each adaptation step. Indeed, for the gradient-based h-adaptive methods, an initial coarse mesh is needed to compute a primary solution for evaluating the gradient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%