2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2016.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An adaptive selective ES-FEM for plastic collapse analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(83 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This problem also investigated by Zouain et al [12], Makrodimopoulos et al [16], Munoz et al [28], H. Nguyen-Xuan et al [71]. The upper bound solutions of this problem was reported in [17], namely α + = 1.825 for ϕ = 0 • and α + = 1.063 for ϕ = 30 • using 177426 stress variables and in [71], namely α + = 1.817 for ϕ = 0 • using 34948 stress variables and α + = 1.061 for ϕ = 30 • using 29768 stress variables are used as reference upper bound values. Also, the lower bound solutions given in [16], namely α − = 1.8089 for ϕ = 0 • and α − = 1.0562 for ϕ = 30 • and in [28] , namely α − = 1.8119 for ϕ = 0 • and α − = 1.0581 for ϕ = 30 • .…”
Section: Block With Two Symmetric Holesmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This problem also investigated by Zouain et al [12], Makrodimopoulos et al [16], Munoz et al [28], H. Nguyen-Xuan et al [71]. The upper bound solutions of this problem was reported in [17], namely α + = 1.825 for ϕ = 0 • and α + = 1.063 for ϕ = 30 • using 177426 stress variables and in [71], namely α + = 1.817 for ϕ = 0 • using 34948 stress variables and α + = 1.061 for ϕ = 30 • using 29768 stress variables are used as reference upper bound values. Also, the lower bound solutions given in [16], namely α − = 1.8089 for ϕ = 0 • and α − = 1.0562 for ϕ = 30 • and in [28] , namely α − = 1.8119 for ϕ = 0 • and α − = 1.0581 for ϕ = 30 • .…”
Section: Block With Two Symmetric Holesmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Recently, smoothed finite element methods (S-FEMs) based on adaptive mesh are also applied to the FSI computations to reduce overall cost [22]. Among these S-FEMs, the edge-based S-FEM (ES-FEM) is found to be the most computationally efficient [23,24]. With regard to meshfree methods, Rabczuk and Eibl [25] and Fakhimi and Lanari [26] described the fluid interactions with large motion of structures by using a smooth particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method.…”
Section: Comparisons Based On Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to ES-FEM, the FS-FEM is more accurate than the standard FEM using the same T4 mesh for dynamic problems [39] and both linear and nonlinear problems [36]. Because of its excellent properties, S-FEM has been applied to a wide range of practical mechanics problems such as fracture mechanics and fatigue behavior [40][41][42][43], nonlinear material behavior analysis [35,38,[44][45][46][47][48], plates and shells [49][50][51][52], piezoelectric structures [43,[53][54][55], heat transfer and thermomechanical problems [56][57][58][59], vibration analysis and acoustics problems [39,58,[60][61][62], and fluid and structure interaction problems [63][64][65][66]. We refer the reader to [67,68] for recent in-depth reviews of S-FEM.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%