2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3034283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Adaptive Resistance Perturbation Based MPPT Algorithm for Photovoltaic Applications

Abstract: This paper proposes a Resistance perturbation based maximum power point tracking (MPPT) with an adaptive control limit algorithm to extract the maximum power from solar photovoltaic (PV) array. This algorithm consists of two main functions, namely 1) resistance perturbation & observation (RP&O) and 2) adaptive resistance control (ARC) limit. The RP&O operates the PV array at maximum power point (MPP), and the ARC limit continuously monitors the resistance of the PV R pv to determine the operating limit of MPP.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The steady-state efficiency of the method proposed in this paper is significantly better than the conventional P&O and adaptive P&O methods under various irradiance intensities, as shown in Figure 19 and Table 6 using the formula in (26). The transient efficiency is only slightly lower than the adaptive P&O method when the irradiance intensity decreases, but higher than Hence, we conclude that the control strategy proposed in this paper significantly improves PV system output efficiency compared to the conventional P&O and adaptive P&O methods and is particularly effective when the irradiation intensity is high.…”
Section: Simulation Analysismentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The steady-state efficiency of the method proposed in this paper is significantly better than the conventional P&O and adaptive P&O methods under various irradiance intensities, as shown in Figure 19 and Table 6 using the formula in (26). The transient efficiency is only slightly lower than the adaptive P&O method when the irradiance intensity decreases, but higher than Hence, we conclude that the control strategy proposed in this paper significantly improves PV system output efficiency compared to the conventional P&O and adaptive P&O methods and is particularly effective when the irradiation intensity is high.…”
Section: Simulation Analysismentioning
confidence: 90%
“…According to [26][27][28], the PV output voltage decreases when increasing the duty cycle. From Figure 3, we can see that the PV cell output power increases when it is on the right-hand side of MPP.…”
Section: Dynamic Loss Analysis Of the Pando Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The testing site has rich sunlight and it is quite possible to install solar photovoltaic [11]. Because irradiation is intermittent, it is not possible for panels to generate continuous and even power [12]. Due to this, the battery is used to store the power produced by the panel, and the converter is the instrument used to transfer this power from the battery [13].…”
Section: Stand-alone Hybrid Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that sense, a great number of MPPT techniques have been introduced, discussed, and tested, such as perturb and observe (P&O) [ 10 , 11 , 12 ], resistance perturbation and observation (RP&O) [ 13 ], incremental conductance (IC) [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ], the beta method [ 18 ], ripple correlation [ 19 , 20 ], systems oscillation [ 21 , 22 ], MPP locus characterization [ 23 ], reinforcement learning [ 24 ], sliding mode [ 25 ], and compensator-based methods [ 7 , 26 ]. Among these approaches, the P&O and IC based on the PI MPPT algorithms demand special attention because they offer outstanding performance and high speeds during initialization procedures [ 7 , 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%