2001
DOI: 10.2307/3316054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An adaptive randomized design with application to estimation

Abstract: When allocating observations to two populations for estimation or testing, the optimal proportion of the data that should be allocated to the first population, if it exists, often depends on unknown parameters. Adaptive designs have thus been proposed, in which allocation of the next observation is based on an estimate of the optimal proportion computed from the data already gathered. The authors introduce a simple randomized adaptive design and give some of its properties. Applications are given to estimating… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, for both the choices of the estimates, we get ρ j+1 ≥ a G 4(j + 1) for any j. Hence the result follows from the Proposition 2 of Melfi, Page, and Geraldes (2001).…”
Section: Asymptoticssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Consequently, for both the choices of the estimates, we get ρ j+1 ≥ a G 4(j + 1) for any j. Hence the result follows from the Proposition 2 of Melfi, Page, and Geraldes (2001).…”
Section: Asymptoticssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Note that this likelihood is unaffected by the adaptive nature of the allocation design and can be used for making inference on the model parameters. See Melfi et al (2001) for an excellent discussion in this context (see also Ware, 1989;Berger and Wolpert, 1984). This likelihood is in very general terms and holds for any general model involving q T; j 's and q P; j 's, or for the joint distribution of the Z sj 's.…”
Section: Maximum Likelihood Estimationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For this reason we can apply Proposition 3.1 of Aletti et al (2013) concerning the adaptive estimators M(n) and N (n) defined in (7), which is a consequence of Theorem 2 of Melfi et al (2001), i.e.…”
Section: The Proportion-sample Size Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because of this asymptotic behavior, RRU models are not in the class of designs targeting a proportion in (0, 1), that usually is previously fixed or computed to optimize some suitable criteria. Hence, all the asymptotic properties concerning these procedures presented in literature [see for instance Melfi and Page (2000), Melfi et al (2001)], are not straightforwardly fulfilled by the RRU designs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation