2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.01.066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Adaptive Multi-critic Neuro-fuzzy Control Framework for Intravenous Anesthesia Administration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the complete set-point tracking problem is presented in a form where we can apply Theorem 1 with the addition of LMIs (18) and (20).…”
Section: Constant Set-point Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the complete set-point tracking problem is presented in a form where we can apply Theorem 1 with the addition of LMIs (18) and (20).…”
Section: Constant Set-point Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model-based control (MBC) schemes can overcome this limitation, by including dynamic mathematical models that describe the underlying processes within the human body. Various MBC approaches have been proposed, using fuzzy control 16 adaptive control, [17][18][19] model based PID controllers 20 and model predictive control (MPC). 4,[21][22][23] More recently, an extension 24 on the usual MPC studies on anesthesia, considers simultaneous administration of Propofol and remifentanil in order to gain control on the analgesic-hypnotic balance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A medical application is displayed in [31], developing control strategies in a closed-loop for infusion and medication administration being especially useful in anesthetic during numerous surgeries to provide stability for the necessary state of consciousness. The authors propose a neuro-fuzzy adaptive controller to overcome the current challenges in control closed loops of the anesthetic, like inter and intrapatient variability, complex and non-linear dynamics, measurement noises and surgical alterations, and sub-impulse and overflow in the induction stage.…”
Section: ) Specific Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, none of the four controllers discussed are by themselves able to overcome the complex problem of anesthesia due to the presence of intraand inter-patient variability, surgical disturbances, and nonlinear dynamics. As recent papers indicate [326], [327], [339], combinations of these controllers -optimized to leverage their individual strengths -show promise for improving the performance of closed-loop anesthesia and achieving acceptable simulation results.…”
Section: Outlook For Automated Anesthesiamentioning
confidence: 99%