2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-017-1873-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Adaptive Metropolis-Hastings Optimization Algorithm of Bayesian Estimation in Non-Stationary Flood Frequency Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
13
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
13
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A well-known approach in uncertainty analysis of model parameters is the behavioral approach [10,11]. Examples of this approach are as follows: Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE) method [12][13][14]; Bayesian method using Metropolis-Hasting algorithm and Adaptive Metropolis (AM) algorithm [1,15,16]; and Markov chain Monte Carlo [17][18][19]. In this approach, the input and output errors are ignored and the threshold of objective functions for selecting parameter values were determined.Using the threshold to select parameter values was developed in the GLUE method, firstly introduced by Beven and Binley [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A well-known approach in uncertainty analysis of model parameters is the behavioral approach [10,11]. Examples of this approach are as follows: Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE) method [12][13][14]; Bayesian method using Metropolis-Hasting algorithm and Adaptive Metropolis (AM) algorithm [1,15,16]; and Markov chain Monte Carlo [17][18][19]. In this approach, the input and output errors are ignored and the threshold of objective functions for selecting parameter values were determined.Using the threshold to select parameter values was developed in the GLUE method, firstly introduced by Beven and Binley [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flood events can be described in terms of the multivariate characteristic variables of peak discharge, water stage and suspended sediment load, which are all relevant to risk analyses. Univariate frequency analysis for these hydrological variables mentioned above can be found in many literatures [2][3][4][5]. Unlike the common frequency distribution, theoretically derived distributions of flood peak are constructed based on dominant runoff generation mechanisms [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the stationary assumption is being increasingly challenged by climate change (Milly et al, 2008;Li et al, 2017;Rolim et al, 2017;Yan et al, 2017a;Xu et al, 2018;Zhang et al, 2018). design rainfall) derived from the probability distribution of extreme rainfall, which is based on historical rainfall records and assumed to be stationary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…design rainfall) derived from the probability distribution of extreme rainfall, which is based on historical rainfall records and assumed to be stationary. However, the stationary assumption is being increasingly challenged by climate change (Milly et al, 2008;Li et al, 2017;Rolim et al, 2017;Yan et al, 2017a;Xu et al, 2018;Zhang et al, 2018). It is anticipated that the frequency and magnitude of extreme rainfall will increase due to global climate change (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%