2021
DOI: 10.1109/tii.2021.3060898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Adaptive Machine Learning Framework for Behind-the-Meter Load/PV Disaggregation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, parametric models are generally limited to addressing simple problems, and the accuracy of their fundamental mapping functions can be questionable. Both parametric models (e.g., linear regression and multilayer perceptron) and non-parametric models (e.g., decision tree and random forest) have been adopted for appliance classification [3], [130], [183], [188], [208], [211], [212]. Although a study in [3] demonstrated that the k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) model is most efficient for energy disaggregation compared to decision trees, discriminant analysis, and Support Vector Machine (SVM), it is important to note that these results were based on a specific dataset.…”
Section: Yinyan Liumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, parametric models are generally limited to addressing simple problems, and the accuracy of their fundamental mapping functions can be questionable. Both parametric models (e.g., linear regression and multilayer perceptron) and non-parametric models (e.g., decision tree and random forest) have been adopted for appliance classification [3], [130], [183], [188], [208], [211], [212]. Although a study in [3] demonstrated that the k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) model is most efficient for energy disaggregation compared to decision trees, discriminant analysis, and Support Vector Machine (SVM), it is important to note that these results were based on a specific dataset.…”
Section: Yinyan Liumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the correct disaggregated load 𝒚 for the aggregate load 𝒙 is known in advance. Various supervised learning approaches, such as linear regression [212], genetic algorithms [153], [200], [249], SVM [122], [188], [189], [250], random decision forest [122], [183], [212], [251], hidden Markov models (HMM) [215], [252], decision trees [3], [212], [253], naive Bayes classifier [254], kNN [3], [171], [188], and deep learning neural networks [109], [110], [112], [116], [197], [240], [255], have been applied in the NILM literature. As outlined in Table IV, supervised NILM is mainly used for regression and classification tasks.…”
Section: ) Supervised Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although NILM has been widely implemented for the identification of conventional loads (e.g., [27], [28]), a low number of research studies have focused on DER at distribution levels. In [29], a disaggregation method for PV systems power generation from an IEEE 123-node standard test-feeder is developed. The approach evaluates the performance of machine learning algorithms including linear regression, random forest, and a multilayer perceptron.…”
Section: Overview Of Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RF is another ML algorithm which operates as an ensemble of decision trees and often utilized for classification and regression tasks. Saeedi et al implemented different ML methods including decision tree, linear regression, and multilinear perceptron (MLP) to estimate PV generation output in Hawaii [74]. They claimed the superior performance by RF with highest R-squared value of 98% as compared to aforementioned ML models.…”
Section: Random Forest (Rf)mentioning
confidence: 99%