2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.05.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An adaptive, fully implicit multigrid phase-field model for the quantitative simulation of non-isothermal binary alloy solidification

Abstract: Published paper AbstractUsing state-of-the-art numerical techniques such as mesh adaptivity, implicit time-stepping and a non-linear multi-grid solver the phase-field equations for the non-isothermal solidification of a dilute binary alloy have been solved. Using the quantitative, thin-interface formulation of the problem we have found that at highLewis number a minimum in the dendrite tip radius is predicted with increasing undercooling, as predicted by marginal stability theory. Over the dimensionless underc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
71
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter we obtain by fitting a parabolic profile to the φ = 0 isoline using a 4 th order interpolation scheme described in [21,34], as this has generally been felt [19,38] to be more directly comparable to analytical dendrite growth theories [5], than the curvature obtained directly from the derivatives of φ at the tip.…”
Section: Description Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latter we obtain by fitting a parabolic profile to the φ = 0 isoline using a 4 th order interpolation scheme described in [21,34], as this has generally been felt [19,38] to be more directly comparable to analytical dendrite growth theories [5], than the curvature obtained directly from the derivatives of φ at the tip.…”
Section: Description Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in the limited number of cases where phase-field models have been applied to alloy systems solidifying under coupled thermo-solutal control [19,20,21,22], σ * has been found to vary with undercooling, alloy concentration and Lewis number (= ratio of thermal to solutal diffusivity, α/D), with this variation in some cases being non-monotonic. The variation of σ * with concentration appear to be borne out experimentally, with a re-evaluation by Li & Beckermann [23] of the data of Chopra et al [ 24 ] for the transparent succinonitrile-acetone system showing a variation in σ * with concentration of between a factor of 2 and 4 depending upon the undercooling considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative phase-field models are being increasingly utilized for quantitative simulations of solidification phenomena. 34,36,[68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81] As mentioned above, significant progress has been made in quantitative phase-field modeling for alloy solidification. The accuracy of quantitative phase-field simulations is evaluated by observing the convergence behavior of the simulation results with decreasing W. It has been demonstrated that the convergence of the results in quantitative phase-field simulations is much faster than that of the results in the conventional phase-field model, [31][32][33] which indicates that accurate results can be obtained using a large value for W in quantitative phase-field models.…”
Section: Advances In Quantitative Computation Of Solidification Micromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For smoothing the error we use a fully-coupled nonlinear weighted Gauss-Seidel iteration where the number of pre-and post-smoothing operations required for optimal convergence is determined empirically. Full details of the numerical scheme are given in [13,14].…”
Section: Description Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The governing equations are descretized using a finite difference approximation based upon a quadrilateral, non-uniform, locally-refined mesh with equal grid spacing in both directions [13,14]. This allows the application of standard second order central difference stencils for the calculation of first and second differentials, while a compact 9-point scheme has been used for Laplacian terms, in order to reduce the mesh induced [15] anisotropy.…”
Section: Description Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%