2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2019.104148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An adaptive finite element method for elastoviscoplastic fluid flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the more elastic EVP droplet, the material continuosly unyields and yields when passing through boundaries of solid zones, while the solid zones remain at same place in steady state. This shows that the solid regions of the droplet are pseudoplugs, which have been observed in EVP flow in porous media [14,42]. We can also observe that the velocity vectors do not show any change in direction or character when entering or leaving the pseudoplug.…”
Section: B Time Evolution Of the Yielding Processsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…For the more elastic EVP droplet, the material continuosly unyields and yields when passing through boundaries of solid zones, while the solid zones remain at same place in steady state. This shows that the solid regions of the droplet are pseudoplugs, which have been observed in EVP flow in porous media [14,42]. We can also observe that the velocity vectors do not show any change in direction or character when entering or leaving the pseudoplug.…”
Section: B Time Evolution Of the Yielding Processsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…In this study, we implement the entire numerical algorithm in an open-source C finite element environment – FreeFEM (Hecht 2012). We have previously validated our numerical implementation and mesh adaptation widely within various studies (Chaparian & Frigaard 2017 b ; Chaparian & Tammisola 2019; Chaparian et al. 2020).…”
Section: Slip Law and The Numerical Algorithm Beyond 1-dmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is clear that the velocity distribution after adaptation (red line) is much closer to the analytical solution (red circles) than the solution of the initial mesh (blue line), and also yields a fine resolution of the yield surfaces – see figure 3( d ). We shall mention that the focus of the present study is not on quantifying these improvements by the mesh adaptation, as it has been previously studied in detail (Roquet & Saramito 2003, 2008; Chaparian & Tammisola 2019).
Figure 3.The [M] problem features: ( a ) velocity profile of the case (fully sliding plug); ( b ) velocity profile of the case (deforming regime); ( c ) the mesh after five cycles of adaptation associated with panel ( b ); ( d ) velocity contour associated with panel ( b ), the green lines show the yield surfaces; ( e , f ) close-up of the cyan windows in the panels ( b , c ), respectively.
…”
Section: Benchmark Problem: Sliding Channel Poiseuille Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations