2019
DOI: 10.1109/tsc.2016.2635133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Adaptive Efficiency-Fairness Meta-Scheduler for Data-Intensive Computing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adaptive approaches achieve performance increases through the adaptation of the scheduling policy or architecture at runtime, providing the benefit of an alternate scheduling approach autonomously without the limitations of hybrid approaches requiring two separate approaches simultaneously. However, current adaptive approaches to scheduling are limited by their need for user provided parameters to inform scheduling decisions [12], or the need for user-generated models [13]. The need for domain-specific knowledge and user intervention for informing adaptation limits the approach as scheduling may only be improved and maintained across all encountered workloads with sufficient data and correct models for all.…”
Section: Adaptive and Learned Schedulersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Adaptive approaches achieve performance increases through the adaptation of the scheduling policy or architecture at runtime, providing the benefit of an alternate scheduling approach autonomously without the limitations of hybrid approaches requiring two separate approaches simultaneously. However, current adaptive approaches to scheduling are limited by their need for user provided parameters to inform scheduling decisions [12], or the need for user-generated models [13]. The need for domain-specific knowledge and user intervention for informing adaptation limits the approach as scheduling may only be improved and maintained across all encountered workloads with sufficient data and correct models for all.…”
Section: Adaptive and Learned Schedulersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Workload-specific schedulers, such as that of Ray [8], focus on improving end-to-end performance for a specific workload type, for which a general-purpose scheduler would perform poorly. Hybrid (e.g., [9]- [11]) and adaptive [2], [12], [13] approaches attempt to gain the best of both by simultaneously employing multiple different scheduling architectures or policies. However, to date they use hand-crafted rules or expect the user to submit detailed specifications with their data processing job to enable selection of the ideal scheduler -or alternatively use offline training of a policy which is then fixed at runtime.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Niu et al [25] propose to formally measure the fairness loss F of a scheduler. They consider J (J ∈ {1,..,k}) is the…”
Section: Problem Formulation Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The completion times of the application of a user i under a specific scheduler and a fair scheduler are t * i and t i respectively. Niu et al [25] calculate first the reduction of the completion time of the applications of a user i ; s i as follows:…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they do not consider the tradeoff between the resource efficiency, job latency, fairness and energy consumption. Therefore, new schedulers [16,17,18,19] are proposed to address the tradeoff between these discordant factors.…”
Section: Hadoop Yarnmentioning
confidence: 99%