2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2960871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Adaptive Droop Control Strategy for Islanded Microgrid Based on Improved Particle Swarm Optimization

Abstract: In an islanded microgrid with multiple distributed generations (DGs), the difference in line impedance may cause local voltage deviation, which leads to a series of problems such as lower power allocation accuracy and bus voltage drop under traditional droop control. In this respect, a method for optimizing the droop control using an improved particle swarm optimization (IPSO) is proposed. Firstly, the microgrid structure and influence of line parameters on traditional droop control strategy is analyzed. Then,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be concluded from Table 3 that compared with the power distribution accuracy under the control algorithm in [28] and [29], the improved control algorithm proposed in this paper significantly improves the distribution accuracy of active and…”
Section: Case 1: Load Switching and Power Decouplingmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It can be concluded from Table 3 that compared with the power distribution accuracy under the control algorithm in [28] and [29], the improved control algorithm proposed in this paper significantly improves the distribution accuracy of active and…”
Section: Case 1: Load Switching and Power Decouplingmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The primary control action is undertaken in matter of seconds in response to load changes without the need for complex communication structure in flexible and reliable manner. Nevertheless, this basic method still suffers from certain drawbacks mainly in reactive power sharing and voltage level impact [27,34,[46][47][48][49][50][51]; frequency restoration and active power sharing [32,[52][53][54][55]; poor renewable energy integration [20,[56][57][58][59]; slow damping response to oscillations in the system [60][61][62][63][64][65]; vulnerability to line impedance and coupling inductance [11,66,67]; inaccurate harmonic compensation [68,69]; and protection scheme interference [11,69]. These limitations of the basic droop control method are addressed by optimal design and selection of the parameters and coefficients [54,60,70] and by proposing new adjustments and techniques to enhance the basic droop control performance [52,53,71].…”
Section: Primary Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2 presents the coefficients of the cost function related to Equation (4). Moreover, Table 3 shows the flexibility specifications of dispatchable units related to (14). Also, the weighting factors in Equations ( 14) and ( 26) are chosen as v 1 = v 2 = v 3 = 1 3 and W 1 = W 2 = 1 2 , respectively.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%