2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11081-010-9114-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An adaptive constraint handling technique for differential evolution with dynamic use of variants in engineering optimization

Abstract: Differential Evolution is a simple and efficient stochastic population-based heuristics for global optimization over continuous spaces. As with other nature inspired techniques, there is no provision for constraint handling in its original formulation, and a few possibilities have been proposed in the literature. In this paper an adaptive penalty technique (APM), which has been shown to be quite effective within genetic algorithms, is adopted for constraint handling within differential evolution. The technique… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [28] a self-adaptive fitness formulation is used. The results reported in [29] were obtained with an adaptive penalty method with dynamic use of DE variants, while in [30] a self-adaptive penalty based genetic algorithm is used. Table 3 reports the best results found by these methods and by our proposed best implementations FA1 and FA2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [28] a self-adaptive fitness formulation is used. The results reported in [29] were obtained with an adaptive penalty method with dynamic use of DE variants, while in [30] a self-adaptive penalty based genetic algorithm is used. Table 3 reports the best results found by these methods and by our proposed best implementations FA1 and FA2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the stochastic ranking technique is denoted by SRES and the global competitive ranking technique is GRES. An adaptive penalty scheme for constraint handling with dynamic use of variants of differential evolution (DUVDE) (Silva et al, 2011) is also used in the comparison. We set the same value of maximum number of generations according to (Runarsson and Yao, 2000;Runarsson and Yao, 2003).…”
Section: Comparing With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of the best objective functions among 30 runs are shown in Table 4. These results are taken from the cited papers (Silva et al, 2011), (Runarsson and Yao, 2000) and (Runarsson and Yao, 2003) respectively. In m-CDE1, we use the population size N dependent on the dimension of test problem and use the maximum number of generations according to (Runarsson and Yao, 2000;Runarsson and Yao, 2003), although in DUVDE the authors used the population size 50 and the maximum number of generations 3684 for all the tested problems.…”
Section: Comparing With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the handling of multi-constraints in manufacturing problems, refer to recent literature [10,34,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64].…”
Section: Handling Of Multi-constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%