2015
DOI: 10.3390/s151229800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Adaptive Channel Access Method for Dynamic Super Dense Wireless Sensor Networks

Abstract: Super dense and distributed wireless sensor networks have become very popular with the development of small cell technology, Internet of Things (IoT), Machine-to-Machine (M2M) communications, Vehicular-to-Vehicular (V2V) communications and public safety networks. While densely deployed wireless networks provide one of the most important and sustainable solutions to improve the accuracy of sensing and spectral efficiency, a new channel access scheme needs to be designed to solve the channel congestion problem i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, collisions from neighbor nodes are so low that the possibility of collisions that can be avoided by the estimation-based backoff algorithms is very small. This conclusion can be verified according to the results in [3]. …”
Section: Performance Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, collisions from neighbor nodes are so low that the possibility of collisions that can be avoided by the estimation-based backoff algorithms is very small. This conclusion can be verified according to the results in [3]. …”
Section: Performance Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In such algorithms, nodes adaptively schedule their time to access the channel by continuously estimating the contention levels among their neighbor nodes. It has been shown in [3] that channel estimation based backoff algorithms can efficiently decrease collisions among neighbor nodes to the theoretical low bound in cases with a wide range of contention levels. However, such algorithms are invalid for the case of collisions from hidden nodes because collisions from hidden nodes are too complex and hard to monitor on-the-fly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specially, in [ 14 ] a receiver-based time constraint model is built to help calculate precise network loadings to adaptively adjust the access threshold, but the fairness among all nodes cannot be guaranteed. In order to improve fairness among all nodes, the size of contention window of MAC layer is adjusted by collision statistics [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ] or handshake mechanisms [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. Specifically, by accurately adjusting the inter-frame space (IFS) interval in the MAC layer, a better fairness performance could be achieved [ 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specially, in [10] a receiver-based time constraint model is built up to help calculate precise network loading to adaptively adjust access threshold, but the fairness among all nodes cannot be guaranteed yet. In order to improve fairness among all nodes, the size of contention window of MAC layer is adjusted by collision statistics [14][15][16][17][18] or handshake mechanisms [19][20][21][22]. Specifically, by accurately adjusting inter-frame space (IFS) interval in MAC layer, a better fairness performance could be achieved [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%