2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2014.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An adaptive bimodal recognition framework using sparse coding for face and ear

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though, the accuracy of this technique does not satisfy the requirement of many real-world applications, where it suffers from significant performance translation and rotation invariant. Huang et al (2015) introduced an adaptive bimodal sparse representation based on classification, that is, adaptive face and ear using bimodal recognition system based on sparse coding, where the qualities of weighted feature is selected. This system requires to pre-process each trait biometric before extracting the features.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though, the accuracy of this technique does not satisfy the requirement of many real-world applications, where it suffers from significant performance translation and rotation invariant. Huang et al (2015) introduced an adaptive bimodal sparse representation based on classification, that is, adaptive face and ear using bimodal recognition system based on sparse coding, where the qualities of weighted feature is selected. This system requires to pre-process each trait biometric before extracting the features.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though, the accuracy of this technique does not satisfy the requirement of many real-world applications, where it suffers from significant performance translation and rotation invariant. Huang et al (Huang et al, 2015) introduced an adaptive bimodal sparse representation based on classification, i.e. adaptive face and ear using bimodal recognition system based on sparse coding, where the qualities of weighted feature is selected.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One typical approach is to measure the quality of the signal extracted from a biometric sensor. For example, in face and ear biometric, the sparse coding error which can detect expression, pose and random pixel corruption has been proposed as a quality metric [13]. In speaker verification, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the perceived quality of speech utterance have been used [38].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, attackers could easily produce a signature that matches the template, resulting in a compromised account. In this context, an assessment of biometric template characteristics could be used to design proper mechanisms to cope with such weak templates [2,13,28,39]. For example, given a template that is predicted to yield high FAR (False Acceptance Rate: the likelihood that forgery samples will be incorrectly accepted by the system) but low FRR (False Rejection Rate: the likelihood that genuine samples will be incorrectly rejected by the system), the system could examine whether a few bad enrolled samples could be safely removed to lower FAR without degrading FRR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%