Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2015 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/vnc.2015.7385577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An adaptive and VANETs-based Next Road Re-routing system for unexpected urban traffic congestion avoidance

Abstract: Some rights reserved. For more information, please see the item record link above.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In NRR, the values of the factors used in the next road cost function vary depending on the different time stamp (i.e., e.OC, e.T T ) and different current/destination location of the vehicle to be rerouted (i.e., e.GD, e.GC). Therefore, a suitable weight value allocation w should be variable for different rerouting requests [14]. In the next road selection, for a particular factor of e, the greater the variation of its value is, the more importance should be given to this factor in the computation of the rerouting decision.…”
Section: Routing Cost Function In Nrrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In NRR, the values of the factors used in the next road cost function vary depending on the different time stamp (i.e., e.OC, e.T T ) and different current/destination location of the vehicle to be rerouted (i.e., e.GD, e.GC). Therefore, a suitable weight value allocation w should be variable for different rerouting requests [14]. In the next road selection, for a particular factor of e, the greater the variation of its value is, the more importance should be given to this factor in the computation of the rerouting decision.…”
Section: Routing Cost Function In Nrrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knorr et al [20] proposed a beacon-based solution to warn drivers about changes in the flow of vehicles when considering the perturbations caused by drivers during vehicles' movement. Wang et al [21] proposed an adaptive beacon-based system for unexpected traffic congestion avoidance. These two solutions are effective to increase locally the traffic flow, however, there are some issues to consider: (i) a high number of transmitted messages among vehicles; (ii) low quality in the traffic estimation of alternative routes; and (iii) selfish decisions.…”
Section: Vehicular Traffic Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…solutions for this problem [3], [4]. Although most of the existing VTRSs obtained promising results for reducing travel time or improving traffic flow; however, they cannot guarantee consideration of non-recurring congestion (unexpected events such as working zones, vehicle accident/breakdown and weather condition) as well as reduction of the trafficrelated nuisances such as air pollution, noise, and fuel consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%