2023
DOI: 10.1109/tvlsi.2023.3288822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Adaptive and Universal Timing Mismatch Estimation Method for TIADCs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Background calibration refers to when the ADC is calibrated while working, but it takes a period of time to converge. The algorithms reported in [18,19] have quite a fast convergence speed; however, they are ineffective at certain frequencies and can even deteriorate the ADC performance due to its own defects, whereas the digital background calibration algorithms in [20][21][22][23][24][25] do require the external input injection, such as a pseudorandom (PN) noise sequence [20][21][22][23] and sinusoidal signals [24] for calibration, which typically have convergence speeds in the order of approximately 10 6 to 10 8 cycles [20][21][22][23], 10 5 cycles, and 10 4 cycles [25]. Compared with the background calibration, the foreground one is much more reliable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Background calibration refers to when the ADC is calibrated while working, but it takes a period of time to converge. The algorithms reported in [18,19] have quite a fast convergence speed; however, they are ineffective at certain frequencies and can even deteriorate the ADC performance due to its own defects, whereas the digital background calibration algorithms in [20][21][22][23][24][25] do require the external input injection, such as a pseudorandom (PN) noise sequence [20][21][22][23] and sinusoidal signals [24] for calibration, which typically have convergence speeds in the order of approximately 10 6 to 10 8 cycles [20][21][22][23], 10 5 cycles, and 10 4 cycles [25]. Compared with the background calibration, the foreground one is much more reliable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%