2016
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggw319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Adaptable Seismic Data Format

Abstract: We present ASDF, the Adaptable Seismic Data Format, a modern and practical data format for all branches of seismology and beyond. The growing volume of freely available data coupled with ever expanding computational power opens avenues to tackle larger and more complex problems. Current bottlenecks include inefficient resource usage and insufficient data organization. Properly scaling a problem requires the resolution of both these challenges, and existing data formats are no longer up to the task. ASDF stores… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
38
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Responding to this challenge, the focus of this work is the development of a scalable and automated full‐waveform inversion procedure. This includes various technical advances in the form of the ObsPy toolkit (Beyreuther et al, ; Krischer, Megies, et al, ; Megies et al, ) to more efficiently process data, the Large‐Scale Seismic Inversion Framework (LASIF; Krischer, Fichtner, et al, ) to aid in managing data in the context of full seismic waveform inversions, and the Adaptable Seismic Data Format (ASDF, Krischer et al, ) to support storing and exchanging data. A graph‐based workflow orchestration framework has been developed to couple these tools to a numerical optimization library resulting in an inversion procedure that can run without human intervention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Responding to this challenge, the focus of this work is the development of a scalable and automated full‐waveform inversion procedure. This includes various technical advances in the form of the ObsPy toolkit (Beyreuther et al, ; Krischer, Megies, et al, ; Megies et al, ) to more efficiently process data, the Large‐Scale Seismic Inversion Framework (LASIF; Krischer, Fichtner, et al, ) to aid in managing data in the context of full seismic waveform inversions, and the Adaptable Seismic Data Format (ASDF, Krischer et al, ) to support storing and exchanging data. A graph‐based workflow orchestration framework has been developed to couple these tools to a numerical optimization library resulting in an inversion procedure that can run without human intervention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The black lines show the tectonic plate boundaries, and the hatched areas are orogens where a further microzonation in smaller tectonic plates is not performed. Plate boundaries and orogens are taken from Bird (2003). (LASIF; Krischer, Fichtner, et al, 2015) to aid in managing data in the context of full seismic waveform inversions, and the Adaptable Seismic Data Format (ASDF, Krischer et al, 2016) to support storing and exchanging data. A graph-based workflow orchestration framework has been developed to couple these tools to a numerical optimization library resulting in an inversion procedure that can run without human intervention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do this, in consultation with the geophysics and HDF communities, the principles of the CF convention from the climate community and the ACDD from the Earth science community were translated into a proposed new geophysics convention that improves programmatic access and interoperability across different geophysical data types, such as seismic, gravity, magnetotelluric, radiometrics [18]. We also applied our benchmarking strategy to the geophysics domain, initially using the domain-popular ObsPy library [19] and SPECFEM3D code [20], to demonstrate how different organizations of the data (in terms of chunking size and compression) impact on the performance by comparing new data formats, such as PH5 [21] and ASDF [22] to traditional formats such as the Society of Exploration Geophysicists-Y Data Exchange Format (SEG-Y), the Standard for the Exchange of Earthquake Data Format (SEED), Seismic Analysis Code (SAC), etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Open source formats, like HDF5 (Folk et al, 2011) and Adaptable Seismic Data Format (ASDF; Krischer et al, 2016), and proprietary formats, like SEIS and Geosoft Database, store metadata and trace data in a more contiguous manner. Typically, a seismic data processing program will instead work with its own proprietary format that's more easily parallelized, and expect a geophysicist to convert their trace data to a format supported by the program.…”
Section: Seg-ymentioning
confidence: 99%