IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004 2004
DOI: 10.1109/robot.2004.1302453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An actuator with physically variable stiffness for highly dynamic legged locomotion

Abstract: Running is a complex dynamical task which places strict design requirements on both the physical components and software control systems of a robot. This paper explores some of those requirements and illustrates how a variable compliance actuation system can satisfy them. We present the design, analysis, simulation, and benchtop experimental validation of such an actuator system. We demonstrate, through simulation, the application of our prototype actuator to the problem of biped running.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
123
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
123
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compliant actuators are gaining interest in the robotic community. Pneumatic artificial muscles [11](such as McKibben muscles, Festo muscles, PPAM [12]), electric compliant actuators (such as VIA [13], AMASC [14] and MACCEPA [15]) and voice coil actuators [16] are some examples of compliant actuators. While some of them exhibit adaptable compliance, so that the stiffness of the actuated joint can be changed, it is not required in the Probo robot.…”
Section: Multi-disciplinary Robotic User Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compliant actuators are gaining interest in the robotic community. Pneumatic artificial muscles [11](such as McKibben muscles, Festo muscles, PPAM [12]), electric compliant actuators (such as VIA [13], AMASC [14] and MACCEPA [15]) and voice coil actuators [16] are some examples of compliant actuators. While some of them exhibit adaptable compliance, so that the stiffness of the actuated joint can be changed, it is not required in the Probo robot.…”
Section: Multi-disciplinary Robotic User Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is comparable to passive walkers [4], which are able ergy efficiently, although restricted to a single walking speed. Different designs with adaptable compliance have been made: at Carnegie Mellon University the AMASC (Actuator with Mechanically Adjustable Series Compliance) [5], at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel the Robotics and Multibody Mechanics research group has developed the PPAM (Pleated Pneumatic Artificial Muscle) [6] used in the biped Lucy [7], at the University of Pisa, Italy, [8] the Variable Stiffness Actuator (VIA) is developed, at Georgia Institute of Technology, USA, a Biologically Inspired Joint Stiffness Control [9] is made.…”
Section: Stemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These devices use electric motors that require a large gear reduction to achieve the desired torque for exoskeleton joints while maintaining a small size. However, when physical interaction with the world is required while maintaining interaction with the user, particularly interaction that involves an impact or kinetic energy transfer [25], the traditional approach of using stiff actuators from classical robotic applications to hold precise positions [22] is not ideal.…”
Section: List Of Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hurst et al [25] design an actuator that physically achieves stiffness variation, the Actuator with Mechanically Adjustable Series Compliance (AMASC), is another device based on the antagonistic configuration and was developed at Carnegie Mellon University. It is a complex mechanism with the main advantage that only one actuator is used to control the stiffness or equilibrium position.…”
Section: Amascmentioning
confidence: 99%