2005
DOI: 10.1080/0307507052000307821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An actor‐network critique of community in higher education: implications for networked learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
57
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
57
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The idea of communities of practice has recently come under critical review (Fox, 2002a;Hodgson & Reynolds, 2002). Fox articulates a view of communities of practice as sub-units within wider actor-networks that include both animate and inanimate elements, described as actants.…”
Section: Network Societymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of communities of practice has recently come under critical review (Fox, 2002a;Hodgson & Reynolds, 2002). Fox articulates a view of communities of practice as sub-units within wider actor-networks that include both animate and inanimate elements, described as actants.…”
Section: Network Societymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…by Callon, 1986) as problematisation (where something tries to establish itself as an 'obligatory passage point' that frames an idea, intermediary or problem and related entities in particular ways); interessement (where selected separate entities are actively connected to this framing and where they negotiate their role in the emerging network); enrolment (the process whereby these entities become engaged in new identities and behaviours and increasingly 'translated' in particular directions by the network relations); and mobilisation (where the network is sufficiently durable that it can be extended to other locations and domains). As Fox (2005) explains, professional competence from an ANT perspective is not a latent attribute of any one element or individual, but a property of some actions rather than others as a network becomes enacted into being. This process of enactment, this interplay of force relations among technology, objects and changes in knowledge at every point in the network, is a continuing struggle -and this struggle is learning.…”
Section: Learning As 'Translation' and Mobilization: Actor Network Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These networks as well as the actors that they create are brought into existence through myriad negotiations among humans and non-human entities. ANT has been particularly helpful in analysing professionals' learning in these networks in studies of management learning (Fox, 2005), learning with ICTs (Edwards and Nicoll, 2006), and teachers' learning (Mulcahy, 2007). In one study using ANT, Gherardi and Nicolini (2000) examine how workers learned safety skills by tracking the negotiations of knowledge at every point as it moved through a system.…”
Section: Learning As 'Translation' and Mobilization: Actor Network Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast with approaches which downplay the socio-political aspect of HR, there are increasing calls that practitioners, other stakeholders and commentators should recognise and embrace the socio-political aspect of HR work, and that critical HR studies should seek to help to illuminate it. In management studies this 'turn to practice' is seen for example in communities of practice (Brown and Duguid 1991;2001) social and organizational learning (Fox 2000(Fox , 2005(Fox , 2006. However, while the turn to practice has generally advocated ethnographic longitudinal studies of many different forms of work practice, this literature also draws upon a wide range of theoretical positions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%