2012
DOI: 10.1109/tro.2012.2201309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Active Uprighting Mechanism for Flying Robots

Abstract: Abstract-Flying robots have unique advantages in the exploration of cluttered environments such as caves or collapsed buildings. Current systems, however, have difficulty in dealing with the large amount of obstacles inherent to such environments. Collisions with obstacles generally result in crashes from which the platform can no longer recover. This paper presents a method to design active uprighting mechanisms for protected rotorcrafttype flying robots that allow them to become upright and subsequently take… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, some impacts can affect the roll and pitch axes of flying platforms, which may cause a fall to the ground because the propulsion system generates accelerations toward undesired directions and may not be able to generate lift. This problem led to the design of protective structures able to withstand falls from a few meters (Klaptocz, Briod, Daler, Zufferey, and Floreano, ) as well as uprighting mechanisms, for example passive (Dees and Yan, ; Klaptocz, Boutinard‐Rouelle, Briod, Zufferey, and Floreano, ; Spletzer, Fischer, and Martinez, ) or active (Klaptocz, Daler, Briod, Zufferey, and Floreano, ). Autonomous flights through a narrow corridor or in a dark room were even demonstrated by such a collision‐robust platform (Klaptocz, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some impacts can affect the roll and pitch axes of flying platforms, which may cause a fall to the ground because the propulsion system generates accelerations toward undesired directions and may not be able to generate lift. This problem led to the design of protective structures able to withstand falls from a few meters (Klaptocz, Briod, Daler, Zufferey, and Floreano, ) as well as uprighting mechanisms, for example passive (Dees and Yan, ; Klaptocz, Boutinard‐Rouelle, Briod, Zufferey, and Floreano, ; Spletzer, Fischer, and Martinez, ) or active (Klaptocz, Daler, Briod, Zufferey, and Floreano, ). Autonomous flights through a narrow corridor or in a dark room were even demonstrated by such a collision‐robust platform (Klaptocz, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Figure 11. Characteristic error for all measurements and filters for a single test at -5 degree ground angle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, passive righting strategies combining a low center of mass with an appropriately egg-shaped chassis enables righting on flat surfaces 8 . Other robots utilize an active mechanism for reorienting the robot by pushing, either using an already available appendage 9 or by equipping the robot with a special mechanism specifically to enable self-righting 10 . At least one robot is even capable of performing a sequence of dynamic maneuvers, progressively storing and releasing an increasing amount of energy to finally overcome a potential energy barrier and achieve the proper orientation 11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protective structure design method above is applied to the protection of a small flying robot similar to the one previously published [8], [9]. The core of the platform is defined by a coaxial motor with 10 cm-diameter rotors.…”
Section: Proof-of-conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%