2022
DOI: 10.3390/nu14051075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Active Image-Based Mobile Food Record Is Feasible for Capturing Eating Occasions among Infants Ages 3–12 Months Old in Hawai‘i

Abstract: The ability to comprehensively assess the diet of infants is essential for monitoring adequate growth; however, it is challenging to assess dietary intake with a high level of accuracy. Infants rely on surrogate reporting by caregivers. This study aimed to determine if surrogate reporters (e.g., caregivers) could use an image-based mobile food record adapted (baby mFR) to record infants’ eating occasions, and via caregiver feedback, could assess the usability and feasibility of the baby mFR in recording infant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Investments in both dietary assessment methods and reliable nutrition composition tables and analyses are needed. While newer methods such as mobile food records and image capture [ 13 , 49 , 50 ] have been used in certain contexts, the capacity for data analysis is lacking in many LMIC. A pipeline is needed to specify the needs for accurate collection and analysis of samples and to ensure that information collected is managed under ethical and data improbability standards [ 51 , 52 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investments in both dietary assessment methods and reliable nutrition composition tables and analyses are needed. While newer methods such as mobile food records and image capture [ 13 , 49 , 50 ] have been used in certain contexts, the capacity for data analysis is lacking in many LMIC. A pipeline is needed to specify the needs for accurate collection and analysis of samples and to ensure that information collected is managed under ethical and data improbability standards [ 51 , 52 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%