2010
DOI: 10.1080/13658810903514172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An active crawler for discovering geospatial Web services and their distribution pattern – A case study of OGC Web Map Service

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
46
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[3,16]. The GetFeatureInfo operation requests metadata for the selected features [16]. Because metadata can help users find the service layers they need and determine how best to use them [36], in general, discovering WMSs means finding the URLs of the GetCapabilities operation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…[3,16]. The GetFeatureInfo operation requests metadata for the selected features [16]. Because metadata can help users find the service layers they need and determine how best to use them [36], in general, discovering WMSs means finding the URLs of the GetCapabilities operation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A WMS provides three operations: GetCapabilities, GetMap, and GetFeatureInfo to support requests for metadata, static maps and feature information about the corresponding georeferenced maps, respectively [1,16]. The GetCapabilities operation is intended to request service metadata, such as service abstract, reference coordinate system, the format, etc.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Second, the available data are poorly documented, making it difficult if not infeasible for researchers to understand their lineage and content and to make sound judgment about their applicability for a specific problem. Third, the data are typically produced using local standards with respect to format, metadata structure, etc., resulting in a high degree of heterogeneity and, thus, hampering the goal of achieving geospatial interoperability [7]. Fourth, failures in open collaboration lead to duplicate efforts in the development of software to analyze and process geospatial data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%