2021
DOI: 10.1017/s1431927621000556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Acquisition Parameter Study for Machine-Learning-Enabled Electron Backscatter Diffraction

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(104 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As revealed by table 5, the model does not seem to be sensitive to the acquisition conditions, provided that they are sufficiently good to evidence a contrast between the different phases on the model input. Machine learning model robustness over different acquisition conditions was scarcely addressed in the literature for microstructures segmentation [11,14,27]. Such approach was however not compatible with the U-Net segmentation model used in this study, as it is mostly composed of convolutional layers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As revealed by table 5, the model does not seem to be sensitive to the acquisition conditions, provided that they are sufficiently good to evidence a contrast between the different phases on the model input. Machine learning model robustness over different acquisition conditions was scarcely addressed in the literature for microstructures segmentation [11,14,27]. Such approach was however not compatible with the U-Net segmentation model used in this study, as it is mostly composed of convolutional layers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The ability of the model to generalize over different acquisition conditions (acquisition step, diffraction pattern acquisition parameters) was also addressed. Indeed, it is necessary to ensure that the developed model will work consistently whatever the EBSD/SEM setup for optimized data acquisition [11,14,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%