2019
DOI: 10.1653/024.102.0316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Acoustic Trap to Survey and Capture Two Neoscapteriscus Species

Abstract: BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 suggests that most of the acoustic energy in the B. oleae signal is concentrated around the fundamental frequency of the wing vibration (300 Hz) and the multiples of the wingbeat harmonics (600 Hz, 900 Hz, 1200 Hz) and decreases rapidly away from the harmonic frequencies. Stridulations, in contrast, have most energy at the harmonics of tooth impact but the energy is fairly uniformly distributed in between (see e.g., the spectrograms of calls from two Neoscapteriscus mole cricket species in Rohde et al 53 ). The difference in energy output suggests that the microtrichia and abdominal pecten probably do not contribute significantly to the acoustic signal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 suggests that most of the acoustic energy in the B. oleae signal is concentrated around the fundamental frequency of the wing vibration (300 Hz) and the multiples of the wingbeat harmonics (600 Hz, 900 Hz, 1200 Hz) and decreases rapidly away from the harmonic frequencies. Stridulations, in contrast, have most energy at the harmonics of tooth impact but the energy is fairly uniformly distributed in between (see e.g., the spectrograms of calls from two Neoscapteriscus mole cricket species in Rohde et al 53 ). The difference in energy output suggests that the microtrichia and abdominal pecten probably do not contribute significantly to the acoustic signal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%