2019
DOI: 10.1109/tii.2018.2889740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An ACO-Based Tool-Path Optimizer for 3-D Printing Applications

Abstract: Layered additive manufacturing, also known as 3D printing, has revolutionized transitional manufacturing processes. Fabrication of 3D models with complex structures is now feasible with 3D printing technologies. By performing careful tool-path optimization, the printing process can be speeded up, while the visual quality of printed objects can be improved simultaneously. The optimization process can be perceived as an undirected rural postman problem (URPP) with multiple constraints. In this paper, a tool-path… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(32 reference statements)
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specific requirements for this sorting to obtain FLM-suitable tours were laid out in Wasser et al (1999). In literature about manufacturing, many elaborated algorithms exist (e.g., Yang et al 2002;Han, Jafari & Seyed 2003;Fok et al 2019). For this reason, sorting is regarded as a 'black box'.…”
Section: Printing Path Derivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific requirements for this sorting to obtain FLM-suitable tours were laid out in Wasser et al (1999). In literature about manufacturing, many elaborated algorithms exist (e.g., Yang et al 2002;Han, Jafari & Seyed 2003;Fok et al 2019). For this reason, sorting is regarded as a 'black box'.…”
Section: Printing Path Derivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another recent solution [17] is related with the detection of stripes caused by motions of printheads without printing with leaking drops of filament. The Authors proposed the use of the ant colony optimization to choose the tool path speeding-up the manufacturing process and avoiding some of the visual artifacts.…”
Section: Machine Vision In Additive Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An automated visual inspection of the 3D printing process may also be related to collision detection and the use of visual feedback [21]. On the other hand, some more advanced systems make it possible to optimize the tool paths during manufacturing [22], as well as to use multiple filaments for fabrication [23]. However, the latter solution, known as MultiFab, requires the use of a 3D scanner and closed-feedback loop for small corrections, hence its usefulness for low-cost devices may be limited, even considering the relatively small budget provided by its authors (less than $7000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%