1986
DOI: 10.1107/s0108270186092478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An acetone complex of platinum

Abstract: 1.956(4) (V) for L=OH-to 2.152 (5) (I) and 2.164 (5)/k (II) for L = OH 2. The variations in the other ligands notwithstanding, the complexes (I)-(V) provide an unusual series of dimetal centres supporting the oxo, hydroxo and aqua bridging ligands. 67 mm -1, F(000) = 672, T= 295 K. 3951 unique reflections with I> 3e(/) were used to refine 248 variables on F giving agreement factors of R = 0.030 and wR = 0.033. The cation has a slightly distorted square-planar geometry at the platinum atom. The acetone ligand … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although chloride is a much better ligand than SO 3 CF 3 −, the Me 3 Sn group has a considerably higher trans influence than methyl, and hence the systems are roughly analogous. Precedence for the stability of platinum−acetone complexes has been established by the structure of [PtMe(Me 2 CO)(PMe 2 Ph) 2 ]PF 6 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although chloride is a much better ligand than SO 3 CF 3 −, the Me 3 Sn group has a considerably higher trans influence than methyl, and hence the systems are roughly analogous. Precedence for the stability of platinum−acetone complexes has been established by the structure of [PtMe(Me 2 CO)(PMe 2 Ph) 2 ]PF 6 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, y;2-benzaldehyde complex 14 (C-O bond length 1.325(7) A) (24e, f) and tj2-benzophenone complex (Et3P)2- HaC^"/ \^CH3 show that electron-withdrawing substituents are not essential for r]2 coordination. Interestingly, acetone binds V to platinum(II) (30,32), as illustrated by 15 (eq 24). This can be rationalized by the lower metal electron density.…”
Section: Other Types Of Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have extended our investigation on the effect of formyl group in ortho phenylethynylbenzaldehyde towards the complex formation by iron pentacarbonyl. It has been observed that h 2 form of bonding of the formyl group is preferred when the metallic part [M] is a d 10 ML 2 fragment (Pt(PR 3 ) 2 [16,17], Pd(PR 3 ) 2 [18], Ni(PR 3 ) 2 [19e21]) or a C 2v d 8 ML 4 fragment (Os(CO) 2 (PR 3 ) 2 [22], Ru(CO) 2 (PR 3 ) 2 [23,24], Fe(CO) 2 (PR 3 ) 2 [25]) while the h 1 form is preferred when [M] is a d 8 ML 3 fragment ( PtCl 2 (pyridine) [26,27], Pt þ CH 3 (PR 3 ) 2 [28]), an octahedral d 6 ML 5 fragment (RuCOCl(PR 3 ) 2 , SnCl 3 [29], Mn 2 (CO) 9 [30]), or a d 6 CpML 2 fragment (CpFe þ (CO) 2 [31,32]). Some exceptions occur for the d 6 ML 5 [Os(NH 3 ) 5 ] 2þ fragment, the coordination is h 2 [33,34] and, in the case of the d 6 CpRe þ NO(PR 3 ) fragment, the coordination is h 1 for ketones [35] and h 2 for aldehydes [36,37] as in the case of CpRe(CO) 2 [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%