2000
DOI: 10.1002/1099-1506(200005)7:4<219::aid-nla196>3.0.co;2-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An accurate parallel block Gram-Schmidt algorithm without reorthogonalization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar block algorithm based upon CGS, justified only by numerical tests, is proposed by Stewart [12]. Other block Gram-Schmidt algorithms are presented by Jalby and Phillippe [10] and Vanderstaeten [13]. A goal of this paper is to establish the stability analysis results for BCGS2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar block algorithm based upon CGS, justified only by numerical tests, is proposed by Stewart [12]. Other block Gram-Schmidt algorithms are presented by Jalby and Phillippe [10] and Vanderstaeten [13]. A goal of this paper is to establish the stability analysis results for BCGS2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CGSI+ is preferred when one wants to selectively orthogonalize, which can reduce the total number of floating-point operations, usually at the expense of increased communication due to the norm computations used to determine which vectors to reorthogonalize. Many different selection criteria have been proposed; see, e.g., [11,30,36,51,56].…”
Section: Bcgs With Reorthogonalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work by Barlow [4], as well as important results by Barlow and Smoktunowicz [5], Vanderstraeten [56], and Jalby and Philippe [31], appear to be the only rigorous stability treatments of BGS. Some of the most influential papers on block Krylov subspace methods (KSMs) devote little or no attention to the stability analysis of the underlying block Arnoldi, and implicitly, BGS, routine.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%