2017
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/276/1/012038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An accurate fatigue damage model for welded joints subjected to variable amplitude loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One lane loading is analysed and obtained load distribution factor to exterior and interior girders are 0.55 and 0.14 respectively. The calculation of the nominal stress ranges of exterior girder involves multiplying the highest response by the distribution factor and the dynamic amplification factor of 1 [12,16]. The result is then divided by the related section modulus of DIP 95 (corroded/uncorroded condition).…”
Section: Stress Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One lane loading is analysed and obtained load distribution factor to exterior and interior girders are 0.55 and 0.14 respectively. The calculation of the nominal stress ranges of exterior girder involves multiplying the highest response by the distribution factor and the dynamic amplification factor of 1 [12,16]. The result is then divided by the related section modulus of DIP 95 (corroded/uncorroded condition).…”
Section: Stress Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2017, Aeran et al [42,43] expressed the need for a model that is based on commonly available S-N curves. They reasoned that none of the available models at that time were readily applicable because they require the determination of extra material parameter(s) or a modification of the S-N curve.…”
Section: Nonlinear Damage Accumulation Models Based On the S-n Curvementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aeran et al demonstrated the importance of a model which is based on the commonly available S-N curves. 33,34 This arose from the perspective that several damage models, depending on additional material parameters, had been proposed. This, in turn, resulted in the models not being readily applicable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%