2012
DOI: 10.1002/xrs.2378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An accurate determination of the K‐shell X‐ray fluorescence yield of silicon

Abstract: A measurement of the K‐shell fluorescence yield of silicon is undertaken in which identified sources of systematic errors in previous measurements are reduced or eliminated. This enables a stringent test of the only two sets of theoretical predictions available for atomic numbers less than 18. Our result ωK = 0.0495 ± 0.0015 is very slightly lower than the non‐relativistic Hartree‐Fock‐Slater (HFS) prediction of 0.0514. This stringent test of the HFS predictions helps to refine the fundamental parameter databa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(110 reference statements)
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As would be expected, there are discrepancies with both treatments in the EXAFS region just above that edge. Below the K edge, very detailed measurements for silicon show much better agreement with FFAST; these silicon data were measured by M. Krumrey and F. Scholze and kindly provided to us by private communication for inclusion in Hopman et al A very different PIXE‐based approach in our own laboratory gave results for magnesium, aluminum, and silicon that were consistent with the Krumrey and Scholze silicon conclusion. A 3‐MeV proton beam was used to excite the K X‐rays of these elements in both elemental and oxide forms, and the element/oxide peak area ratios were measured .…”
Section: Attenuation Coefficient Schemessupporting
confidence: 62%
“…As would be expected, there are discrepancies with both treatments in the EXAFS region just above that edge. Below the K edge, very detailed measurements for silicon show much better agreement with FFAST; these silicon data were measured by M. Krumrey and F. Scholze and kindly provided to us by private communication for inclusion in Hopman et al A very different PIXE‐based approach in our own laboratory gave results for magnesium, aluminum, and silicon that were consistent with the Krumrey and Scholze silicon conclusion. A 3‐MeV proton beam was used to excite the K X‐rays of these elements in both elemental and oxide forms, and the element/oxide peak area ratios were measured .…”
Section: Attenuation Coefficient Schemessupporting
confidence: 62%
“…5. In this case, the relative standard deviation is larger (about 2.5% for the partial values, instead of 1.4% in the reflection mode), and the total Kshell fluorescence yield is found to be ω K = 0.552 (13). Both series of results are fully consistent, and the final experimental value is obtained as the weighted mean, which gives ω K = 0.553 (13).…”
Section: B Measurements Of the Fluorescence Yieldmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In this case, the relative standard deviation is larger (about 2.5% for the partial values, instead of 1.4% in the reflection mode), and the total Kshell fluorescence yield is found to be ω K = 0.552 (13). Both series of results are fully consistent, and the final experimental value is obtained as the weighted mean, which gives ω K = 0.553 (13). Table IV reports the the K-shell fluorescence yield values for Ge (experimental and theoretical) obtained in this work, together with the experimental, theoretical, and semi-empirical values obtained by other authors.…”
Section: B Measurements Of the Fluorescence Yieldmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations