2015
DOI: 10.14257/ijsip.2015.8.7.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Accelerated Iterative Hard Thresholding Method for Matrix Completion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, experimentally, we found that APGD leads to a faster convergence and hence we employ APGD in the proposed BPR algorithm. Similar observations were made in the context of low-rank matrix completion [46] and PhaseLift [24].…”
Section: The Binary Phase Retrieval (Bpr) Problemsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…However, experimentally, we found that APGD leads to a faster convergence and hence we employ APGD in the proposed BPR algorithm. Similar observations were made in the context of low-rank matrix completion [46] and PhaseLift [24].…”
Section: The Binary Phase Retrieval (Bpr) Problemsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…For other related numerical results, we refer to papers [13,20], where they have considered a slightly different versions of the tensor iterative hard thresholding algorithm and compared it with NTIHT.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, an acceleration of the PGD using Nesterov's scheme [49] is not guaranteed in this setting. Nonetheless, motivated by the accelerated singularvalue hard-thresholding strategy adopted in [50] for low-rank matrix completion problems, we go ahead with incorporating a momentum factor in the QPR and SQPR algorithms and investigate empirically if it would result in acceleration. It turns out, from the simulation results, that incorporating the momentum factor indeed results in accelerated convergence (Section V-A contains the simulation results).…”
Section: B Reconstruction Algorithms For Qprmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defining ϕ i (τ ) = Φ τ − u 2 i , ϕ i (τ ) = Φ τ − u 2 i , and ϕ i (τ ) = Φ τ − u 2i , for τ ∈ R, we write βi in(50) asβi = k j=1 2 [ϕ i (τ j−1 ) − ϕ i (τ j )] + 4u 2 i [ϕ i (τ j ) − ϕ i (τ j−1 )] − 4u [ϕ i (τ j ) − ϕ i (ϕ j−1 )] 2 ϕ i (τ j ) − ϕ i (τ j−1 ).…”
unclassified