1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0004-3702(97)00015-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
594
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 488 publications
(635 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
594
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Building upon their results, Eshghi and I (1989) showed that negation as failure in logic programming can also be understood in abductive terms. More recently, Dung and his collaborators (Bondarenko et al 1997 ;Dung et al, 2006) have shown that most non-monotonic logics can be interpreted in terms of arguments and counter-arguments supported by abductive hypotheses. Moreover, Poole (1993Poole ( , 1997 has shown that Baysian networks can be understood as abductive logic programs with assumptions that have associated probabilities.…”
Section: Non-monotonic Reasoning Abduction and Argumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building upon their results, Eshghi and I (1989) showed that negation as failure in logic programming can also be understood in abductive terms. More recently, Dung and his collaborators (Bondarenko et al 1997 ;Dung et al, 2006) have shown that most non-monotonic logics can be interpreted in terms of arguments and counter-arguments supported by abductive hypotheses. Moreover, Poole (1993Poole ( , 1997 has shown that Baysian networks can be understood as abductive logic programs with assumptions that have associated probabilities.…”
Section: Non-monotonic Reasoning Abduction and Argumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as envisaged in [32]. We de ne a notion of dominance to characterise \best" items, and show that these items are those that correspond, within the family of argumentation frameworks considered, to admissible arguments as de ned in [4,13]. Intuitively, the method relies upon comparing the value of di erent items by \arguing" about the bene ts they provide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, several notions of \acceptability", referred to as extensionbased semantics, have been de ned and studied [12,4,13,10]. In this paper we are concerned with the semantics of admissibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations